Rewatched
Conan the Destroyer on pay-TV about two years ago, for the first time since seeing it in the '80s.
Yes, it's dodge-worthy.
The first one,
Conan the Barbarian (1982), was tailored for adults. With its nudity and violence, it got an R-rating... and was all the better for it.
The sequel suffered from the decision to make it a kid-friendly movie with a PG rating. It might've worked as a straightforward action movie with the gore toned down, but they made the mistake of trying to "camp it up" with weak humor and silly dialogue, all of which fell flat.
Some of the FX work very well, e.g. the forced-perspective miniatures used to create castles, giant statues, etc.
But the creature FX are laughable... puppets with low-grade animatronics, actors in rubber masks, etc. Even as every line that was supposed to be funny elicits a groan, every monster that was supposed to be scary elicits a laugh. Ray Harryhausen had done better creature FX with stop-motion animation two or three decades earlier.
After
Conan the Destroyer, Schwarzenegger still went on to co-star with Brigitte Nielsen in the equally bad
Red Sonja (1985) before, wisely, walking away from the sword-and-fantasy genre.
____________________________________________More recently saw the remake of
Flatliners, starring Ellen Page.
The 1990 original (with Julia Roberts and Kiefer Sutherland) was a movie that failed to make the best of its premise (medical students experimenting with the near-death phenomenon), and the 2017 movie falls even flatter (pun intended). The newer movie rates a feeble 4% at RottenTomatoes, which is about right, IMO.