! |
MODNOTE Reports for this post have been dealt with. |
The religious mantra of the Church of Evidentialism (a popular atheist sect, especially on the Internet) is the following:
Where's your evidence / Where's your evidence / Where's your evidence / Where's your evidence
It is as annoying and repetitive as the Hare Hare Krisna mantra.
But what evidentialists never tell us, or never ask themselves, is the following:
1) What kind of evidence should we look for, considering what we're talking about? (an immaterial entity)
2) If God does exist, why should He be under the obligation to provide the kind of evidence of the Church of Evidentialist members expect?
3) What if he has already given us enough evidence, but we're looking at the wrong place?
Concerning (1), what it is that God explains is the following: why is it that anything at all exists? So God doesn't serve as a scientific explanation for X; God is the explanation as to why things are the way they are and why they exist, as opposed to how things are. So clearly the kind of evidence we should be looking for is in a form of a philosophical argument, for it concerns philosophy to figure out why it is that things exist, as opposed to not existing.
And we have dozens of those arguments! Those arguments, I believe, are sufficient to make a belief in God rational, and we'll see with (3) how we can have the confirmation that not only it is rational to believe in God, but that we can know that God exists.
About (2), I see no reason why a God should lower Himself to provide the kind of evidence the fundie-evidentialo-angry atheist requests. Ie, performing magic tricks in the sky or stuff like that. Not to mention, if God indeed does exist, perhaps it is that he knows that if He would provide more evidence for His existence, the atheist would still reject His existence so God doesn't bother with this sort of magic tricks.
(3), Well I believe that God does give us all the best possible evidence for His existence we could hope for. The Inner Testimony of the Holy Spirit is the best evidence we could possibly have! We can know in our heart, with absolute certainty, that God exists with the Inner Testimony of the Holy Spirit, if we are open-minded and accept Him in our heart. Of course the atheist could simply say that I'm lying, or deluded; but in the absence of a defeater, I see no reason to reject my inner experience. If the atheist is accusing me of lying, what's stopping me to accuse the atheist of lying? It could be that it is actually the atheist who is deluding himself and repress the evidence because he does not want to believe in God! As far as I'm concerned, I have all the evidence I need!