Thomas Eshuis wrote:

Homosexuality isn't natural, and it's pretty freaking obvious. You're telling me you can get a baby from screwing a guy in his butt? I think not. Men + Women = Human Existence, and this is the undisputed truth that we all know, that we all feel. I don't care what the darned animals do, they're sinning just like the gays. That changes nothing about the truth.

NOTHING.

redwhine wrote:

Thomas Eshuis wrote:

Homosexuality isn't natural, and it's pretty freaking obvious. You're telling me you can get a baby from screwing a guy in his butt? I think not. Men + Women = Human Existence, and this is the undisputed truth that we all know, that we all feel. I don't care what the darned animals do, they're sinning just like the gays. That changes nothing about the truth.

NOTHING.

You can't get a baby from screwing a woman in her butt, neither.

Varangian wrote:

redwhine wrote:

Thomas Eshuis wrote:

Homosexuality isn't natural, and it's pretty freaking obvious. You're telling me you can get a baby from screwing a guy in his butt? I think not. Men + Women = Human Existence, and this is the undisputed truth that we all know, that we all feel. I don't care what the darned animals do, they're sinning just like the gays. That changes nothing about the truth.

NOTHING.

You can't get a baby from screwing a woman in her butt, neither.

You can't? Then how were Ray Comfort, Ken Ham and other creationist conceived?

aban57 wrote:

Stumped wrote:A young earth creationist I met didn't believe that we could know anything science claims to have discovered about the sun because it's too far away. Presumably in her world knowledge and understanding is inversely proportional to the distance from the subject matter.

That's just bad advertisement for the education system of the country she lives in...
Apart from the obvious brainwashing of course.

You would have to be a total bonehead not to know that CORN was ONLY grown in the Americas during ancient biblical times. So why is CORN in the BIBLE®?

CORN is in the Bible because the PEOPLE, PLACES, and EVENTS of the Biblical narratives were in the AMERICAS! True story. Armed with this revelation and my growing body of Biblical knowledge, I embarked on this exciting crusade to educate others about my discovery 3 years ago. In the ensuing several years, I was challenged, attacked, accused of vicious "isms" and ill will, and in general maligned by would be Biblical scholars and armchair archaeologists. I started a BLOG to help track my journey, there you can find some of the dialog I was routinely subjected to.

The difficult situation with CORN in the BIBLE® is that most people, due to the brainwashing that has been handed down through generations, firmly believe that the Biblical events happened in the Middle East. After much research I can PROVE that the Middle East has absolutely NOTHING to do with the history, geography, and genealogy of the Biblical Scriptures. Nothing!

Code: Select all

http://corninthebible.com/

aban57 wrote:it HAS to be a poe, nobody can be THAT stupid and be able to breathe by himself.

corn1
kɔːn/
noun
noun: corn; plural noun: corns

1.
British
the chief cereal crop of a district, especially (in England) wheat or (in Scotland) oats.
"fields of corn"
synonyms: grain, cereal, cereal crop
"the mill was used for grinding corn"
the grain of a cereal crop.
synonyms: grain, cereal, cereal crop
"the mill was used for grinding corn"
North American, Australian, and New Zealand term for maize.
synonyms: sweetcorn, maize, corn on the cob, Indian corn;
mealie
"she opened a packet of baby corn"

There is evidence, from a vast assortment of things, that suggest that perhaps there are elements of reality and cosmos that point towards things of a metaphysical nature. However athiests refuse the metaphysical just as quickly as they would a single creator.
That is my beef with you reductionist materialist types. It's not that I'm a theist and your an atheist, it's that I see certain kinds of evidence on top of lower evidence and you see lower evidence And that's it..... nothing more. I see nonlocality of subatomic particles as evidence for an underlying unifying reality of a hyperspatial universal consciousness. And I also see it as a quantum representation in the earthly physical realm of bizarre fractal mathematical manifestations of energy. You only see the latter.
There is also evidence, of the logical, rational type, of a force that is "super"natural. Existing outside of "time & space", the space time continuum, in the astrophysics theory of the big bang... That force that is the source behind the big bang. You only see it as the beginning of materialistic existence believing it to begin by itself,... that very thought and statement is illogical in of itself. So you see my friends I'm not arguing for the Christian God here, or Zues, or allah, I'm simply arguing for the metaphysical aspect of reality underlying the materialistic surface reality. My problem with athiests is that such imagination and possibilities are just as taboo and crazy in the minds of the dogmatic atheist worldview as the notion of the tooth fairy,.. as it were. This saddens me. The state of human discovery and imagination trekking through time onwards towards understanding, being brought to a standstill due to surface level narrow mindedness limited by simple materialism. A.k.a the modern atheist.

hackenslash wrote:I've encountered that one on a few groups. She's special.

Meanwhile, as promised, I'm off to permanently delete my Faceache account.

hackenslash wrote:Too much time wasted for too little return. In the time I've burned there, I could have finished not just the book in front of me but the two I have in concept stage as well.