Law would empower countries to file cases against non-resident violators
Moderators: kiore, Blip, The_Metatron
Evolving wrote:Blip, intrepid pilot of light aircraft and wrangler with alligators.
The official insisted that the draft law does not clash with freedom of expression.
Evolving wrote:Blip, intrepid pilot of light aircraft and wrangler with alligators.
Blackadder wrote:The official insisted that the draft law does not clash with freedom of expression.
james1v wrote:
It seems to me, they want to squash, violently, any criticism of Mo. On the internet and elswhere. Thats all. Because they sure as fook dont repect other religions, or those people with none.
laklak wrote:The best way to undermine fanatical Islam is a massive air drop of porn, beer and smart phones.
chairman bill wrote:It's the fuckwitted belief that they can criminalise actions outside of their countries, and act on that 'criminalisation'. Ridiculous. I mean, it's not as if there's any precedent or anything, such as an act that allows a British citizen to be extradited to the US, for an 'offence' committed here, but where it is something that isn't a crime in the UK ... oh wait ...
Matthew Shute wrote:Most of the members of this website must have publicly derided one religion/religious precept or another; off to court we all go!
I must've missed the memo explaining the world's sudden lurch back to the 1300s. I do wish the Qataris would keep me informed.
No need. They'll try to get us extradited, apparently.babel wrote:Matthew Shute wrote:Most of the members of this website must have publicly derided one religion/religious precept or another; off to court we all go!
I must've missed the memo explaining the world's sudden lurch back to the 1300s. I do wish the Qataris would keep me informed.
We can charter a plane to go to the qatari court.
Users viewing this topic: No registered users and 1 guest