Scientific claims in the Koran

a list?...

Abrahamic religion, you know, the one with the mosques...

Moderators: kiore, Blip, The_Metatron

Re: Scientific claims in the Koran

#21  Postby Pertinax » Jun 01, 2012 10:28 am

This blog tracks and comments on news relevant to the interplay of science & religion - including scientific debates taking place in the Muslim world.
http://sciencereligionnews.blogspot.fi/ ... udoscience
Pertinax
 
Posts: 2

Finland (fi)
Print view this post

Re: Scientific claims in the Koran

#22  Postby CarlPierce » Jul 05, 2012 10:55 am

Turns out they predicted the existance of the Higgs boson in the Koran as well. We could have saved billions.
User avatar
CarlPierce
RS Donator
 
Posts: 4105
Age: 59
Male

United Kingdom (uk)
Print view this post

Re: Scientific claims in the Koran

#23  Postby campermon » Jul 05, 2012 4:51 pm

NilsGLindgren wrote:
campermon wrote:Is there anywhere on the webz with a list of scientific claims from the koran and their subsequent debukation (is that a word/ ) ?

(My underline) No, the correct term is deburqation (n., as in, removing an unnecessary amount of stuff that keeps out fresh air and hides what there is no reason to hide, from, Wisdom of Nils, volume 7) :thumbup:


:lol:

:cheers:
Scarlett and Ironclad wrote:Campermon,...a middle aged, middle class, Guardian reading, dad of four, knackered hippy, woolly jumper wearing wino and science teacher.
User avatar
campermon
RS Donator
THREAD STARTER
 
Posts: 17444
Age: 54
Male

United Kingdom (uk)
Print view this post

Re: Scientific claims in the Koran

#24  Postby campermon » Jul 05, 2012 4:52 pm

CarlPierce wrote:Turns out they predicted the existance of the Higgs boson in the Koran as well. We could have saved billions.


:rofl:
Scarlett and Ironclad wrote:Campermon,...a middle aged, middle class, Guardian reading, dad of four, knackered hippy, woolly jumper wearing wino and science teacher.
User avatar
campermon
RS Donator
THREAD STARTER
 
Posts: 17444
Age: 54
Male

United Kingdom (uk)
Print view this post

Re: Scientific claims in the Koran

#25  Postby Scot Dutchy » Jul 05, 2012 5:56 pm

Rikkets is very prevelent in Saudie Arabia.
Myths in islam Women and islam Musilm opinion polls


"Religion is excellent stuff for keeping common people quiet.” — Napoleon Bonaparte
User avatar
Scot Dutchy
 
Posts: 43119
Age: 75
Male

Country: Nederland
European Union (eur)
Print view this post

Re: Scientific claims in the Koran

#26  Postby Oeditor » Jul 05, 2012 6:57 pm

Scot Dutchy wrote:Rikkets is very prevelent in Saudie Arabia.
Not enough vitamin D in that panacea, camel piss, then?
The very reason food is sealed is to keep information out. - Gary Ablett Snr.
Oeditor
 
Posts: 4581
Male

United Kingdom (uk)
Print view this post

Re: Scientific claims in the Koran

#27  Postby FredJackM » Jul 06, 2012 5:17 am

I once got into debate about "science" in the Q'uran on an AOL religious forum > 10 years ago.. I cannot remember the arguments much, but at the time I had a Q'uran which I read to examine the claims open-mindedly and debate them honestly. The Q'uran, IMO, is far more 'sound' than the bible (which is, in fact, not saying anything - the bible is utter crap from page 1) but it is a lot shorter. I never found one single thing (scientific or moral) which was not within the scope of common knowledge available at the time it was written.

I do remember one particular error related to science - This was on the origin of iron on earth. The Q'uran clearly states that there was no iron on earth before god (allah) sent it as a demonstration of something (I forget what!) - as in, metalic meteorites.. I asked my Muslim friend (it was an extremely civil debate - completely different to the sort of "debates" I was engaged in with Christians, who rounded on me and got me kicked out of AOL) I challenged this Q'uran "science" first on grounds that it was obviously untrue from geological perspective and for many other reasons, then, when this was contested, I asked whether man was on the earth before iron came to earth (the Q'uran clearly stated that man was, as iron had been "sent" as a "demonstration" for man) - and was told that obviosly man was on earth before iron was. I then asked what element in the human (and animal) physiology allowed oxygen to be utilised, and therefore how was it possible for man to have witnessed the arrival of iron as without iron man cannot live.

No answer was forthcoming! ;)

IMO, unless one is dealing with someone who wants to find reason to abandon their faith, they are extremely unlikely to abandon it even if shown conclusive evidence that their faith is misplaced. The reason most believers even look at science is not for their own enlightenment - it is to appear "rational" and with the feeble hope that they can make converts using their claim that their faith is not in conflict with science. This "tactic" only works on those who want (for whatever reason) to embrace faith (as in, relinquish reason) - and these people have no real understanding of, or interest in science.

Fred.
FredJackM
 
Name: Frederick Jack Mundell
Posts: 31

Country: England
Print view this post

Re: Scientific claims in the Koran

#28  Postby byofrcs » Jul 06, 2012 10:44 am

The mental gymnastics that those Muslims who try and show how the Koran is prescient to science is astounding. Here is a perfect example,

http://www.miraclesofthequran.com/scientific_30.html

which is by a well known crook, Harun Yahya, which quotes the Qur'an sura, 57:25 "And We also sent down iron in which there lies great force and which has many uses for mankind… "

They mention the nova/supernova and the fusion limit of iron but the real lies are when they explain this,

"All this shows that iron did not form on the Earth, but was carried from Supernovas, and was "sent down," as stated in the verse. It is clear that this fact could not have been known in the 7th century, when the Qur'an was revealed. Nevertheless, this fact is related in the Qur'an, the Word of Allah, Who encompasses all things in His infinite knowledge. "

Oh no it doesn't, what the Koran is describing is iron-meteorites and not stellar nuclear synthesis. Most iron on this planet accreted along with all the elements on Earth i.e. pretty well ALL the elements "fell" from the sky including the most abundant metal that no religious book has ever mentioned - aluminium. Sure iron is essential but so are copper, cobalt and zinc and they have also been fused in stars but the Koran doesn't support them being synthesised in that way.

In the end a proper education of children will slow these lying Muslims from poisoning the understanding of the natural sciences and Harun Yahya's crap must never enter in any school unless it is in the form of recycled pulp used for toilet paper.
In America the battle is between common cents distorted by profits and common sense distorted by prophets.
User avatar
byofrcs
RS Donator
 
Name: Lincoln Phipps
Posts: 7906
Age: 60
Male

Country: Tax, sleep, identity ?
European Union (eur)
Print view this post

Re: Scientific claims in the Koran

#29  Postby sturmgewehr » Jul 06, 2012 1:04 pm

As I said before u can check how all the Quranic Scientific Miracles are debunked here on this forum especially on this sub forum:

http://www.councilofexmuslims.com/index.php?board=51.0


Starting with the Miraculous claims about the Big Bang and Expanding universe, Embryology, Geology and other stuff.
User avatar
sturmgewehr
 
Posts: 264

Albania (al)
Print view this post

Re: Scientific claims in the Koran

#30  Postby Pertinax » Jul 06, 2012 5:14 pm

byofrcs wrote:The mental gymnastics that those Muslims who try and show how the Koran is prescient to science is astounding. Here is a perfect example,

http://www.miraclesofthequran.com/scientific_30.html

which is by a well known crook, Harun Yahya, which quotes the Qur'an sura, 57:25 "And We also sent down iron in which there lies great force and which has many uses for mankind… "

They mention the nova/supernova and the fusion limit of iron but the real lies are when they explain this,

"All this shows that iron did not form on the Earth, but was carried from Supernovas, and was "sent down," as stated in the verse. It is clear that this fact could not have been known in the 7th century, when the Qur'an was revealed. Nevertheless, this fact is related in the Qur'an, the Word of Allah, Who encompasses all things in His infinite knowledge. "

Oh no it doesn't, what the Koran is describing is iron-meteorites and not stellar nuclear synthesis. Most iron on this planet accreted along with all the elements on Earth i.e. pretty well ALL the elements "fell" from the sky including the most abundant metal that no religious book has ever mentioned - aluminium. Sure iron is essential but so are copper, cobalt and zinc and they have also been fused in stars but the Koran doesn't support them being synthesised in that way.

In the end a proper education of children will slow these lying Muslims from poisoning the understanding of the natural sciences and Harun Yahya's crap must never enter in any school unless it is in the form of recycled pulp used for toilet paper.


57:25 "And We also sent down iron in which there lies great force and which has many uses for mankind… "

What it really means
Tafsir Ibn Kathir
(And We brought forth iron wherein is mighty power,) meaning, `We made iron a deterrent for those who refuse the truth and oppose it after the proof has been established against them.' Allah's Messenger remained in Makkah for thirteen years. During that time, the revelation continued being sent to him, containing arguments against the idolators and explaining Tawhid with detail and proofs. When the evidence was established against those who defied the Messenger , Allah decreed the Hijrah. Then He ordered the believers to fight the disbelievers using swords, using them to strike the necks and foreheads of those who opposed, rejected and denied the Qur'an.
(wherein is mighty power,) in reference to weapons, such as swords, spears, daggers, arrows, shields, and so forth,
Pertinax
 
Posts: 2

Finland (fi)
Print view this post

Re: Scientific claims in the Koran

#31  Postby Oeditor » Jul 06, 2012 7:44 pm

Dated around 1370, too, so it took about 700 years to come up with an excuse that it wasn't about a massive shower of meteorites but a metaphor about warfare. Then another 700 years to conclude that it was a refined version of the meteorite story after all. Sounds like typical apologetics to me.
The very reason food is sealed is to keep information out. - Gary Ablett Snr.
Oeditor
 
Posts: 4581
Male

United Kingdom (uk)
Print view this post

Re: Scientific claims in the Koran

#32  Postby byofrcs » Jul 07, 2012 5:38 am

Pertinax wrote:
byofrcs wrote:The mental gymnastics that those Muslims who try and show how the Koran is prescient to science is astounding. Here is a perfect example,

http://www.miraclesofthequran.com/scientific_30.html

which is by a well known crook, Harun Yahya, which quotes the Qur'an sura, 57:25 "And We also sent down iron in which there lies great force and which has many uses for mankind… "

They mention the nova/supernova and the fusion limit of iron but the real lies are when they explain this,

"All this shows that iron did not form on the Earth, but was carried from Supernovas, and was "sent down," as stated in the verse. It is clear that this fact could not have been known in the 7th century, when the Qur'an was revealed. Nevertheless, this fact is related in the Qur'an, the Word of Allah, Who encompasses all things in His infinite knowledge. "

Oh no it doesn't, what the Koran is describing is iron-meteorites and not stellar nuclear synthesis. Most iron on this planet accreted along with all the elements on Earth i.e. pretty well ALL the elements "fell" from the sky including the most abundant metal that no religious book has ever mentioned - aluminium. Sure iron is essential but so are copper, cobalt and zinc and they have also been fused in stars but the Koran doesn't support them being synthesised in that way.

In the end a proper education of children will slow these lying Muslims from poisoning the understanding of the natural sciences and Harun Yahya's crap must never enter in any school unless it is in the form of recycled pulp used for toilet paper.


57:25 "And We also sent down iron in which there lies great force and which has many uses for mankind… "

What it really means
Tafsir Ibn Kathir
(And We brought forth iron wherein is mighty power,) meaning, `We made iron a deterrent for those who refuse the truth and oppose it after the proof has been established against them.' Allah's Messenger remained in Makkah for thirteen years. During that time, the revelation continued being sent to him, containing arguments against the idolators and explaining Tawhid with detail and proofs. When the evidence was established against those who defied the Messenger , Allah decreed the Hijrah. Then He ordered the believers to fight the disbelievers using swords, using them to strike the necks and foreheads of those who opposed, rejected and denied the Qur'an.
(wherein is mighty power,) in reference to weapons, such as swords, spears, daggers, arrows, shields, and so forth,


No that still does not make any sense - the power of a weapon is in the mind of the wielder not the weapon itself. A suitably strong mind with an empty hand can destroy even the greatest army of well armed fools.

That Islam needs weapons shows the world the paucity of its truth value.
In America the battle is between common cents distorted by profits and common sense distorted by prophets.
User avatar
byofrcs
RS Donator
 
Name: Lincoln Phipps
Posts: 7906
Age: 60
Male

Country: Tax, sleep, identity ?
European Union (eur)
Print view this post

Re: Scientific claims in the Koran

#33  Postby shukr26338 » Aug 13, 2013 12:21 am

birth of human being in al quran - checck it out at http://www.miraclesofthequran.com/scientific_57.html
shukr26338
 
Name: mathlife
Posts: 2

Country: BRUNEI
Malaysia (my)
Print view this post

Re: Scientific claims in the Koran

#34  Postby BlackBart » Aug 13, 2013 10:37 am

You don't crucify people! Not on Good Friday! - Harold Shand
User avatar
BlackBart
 
Name: rotten bart
Posts: 12607
Age: 61
Male

United Kingdom (uk)
Print view this post

Re: Scientific claims in the Koran

#35  Postby Shrunk » Aug 13, 2013 10:57 am

shukr26338 wrote:birth of human being in al quran - checck it out at http://www.miraclesofthequran.com/scientific_57.html







You're welcome.
"A community is infinitely more brutalised by the habitual employment of punishment than it is by the occasional occurrence of crime." -Oscar Wilde
User avatar
Shrunk
 
Posts: 26170
Age: 59
Male

Country: Canada
Canada (ca)
Print view this post

Re: Scientific claims in the Koran

#36  Postby Scot Dutchy » Aug 13, 2013 3:09 pm

Conclusion

The Qur'anic Embryology Pseudoscience can be seen to be false due to the following points:

1. The Qur'an itself omits mention of the ovum in human reproduction, with doctrinal evidence that it regards the progeny to be the resulting union between the seed from the male parent and the female parent as tilth. As tilth do not provide genetic material to the seed, it is abundantly clear that the Qur'an regards the nutfah (semen) as the diploid seed. Moreover, the choice of the words nutfah (small amount of liquid) and maa' maheenin (water/liquid disdained) in key passages indicate a belief that the embryo is formed out of semen, with no knowledge of the sperm cell.

2. The Qur'an includes an initial dust stage that cannot be reconciled with modern embryology.

3. The missing stages of verse 40:67 contradict the other embryology verses.

4. The stages of bone formation then clothing with flesh is in error, even assuming that izhaam means both bone and cartilage.

5. The Qur'anic view of cell differentiation at the Mudgha stage is incorrect, as modern embryology has discovered cell differentiation occurring before and after the putative ‘Mudgha’ stage.

6. The QEP claim that Qur'an correctly predicted the beginning of the fetal stage is debunked because the transition between the embryo and the fetus is arbitrary.

7. The QEP claim that the Qur'an correctly states the least period of conception at 24 weeks is in error, as according to modern medical knowledge this period is closer to 21-22 weeks or even less with advanced medical science, and at least 30 weeks without modern medical assistance.

http://www.wikiislam.net/wiki/Embryology_in_the_Qur%27an
Myths in islam Women and islam Musilm opinion polls


"Religion is excellent stuff for keeping common people quiet.” — Napoleon Bonaparte
User avatar
Scot Dutchy
 
Posts: 43119
Age: 75
Male

Country: Nederland
European Union (eur)
Print view this post

Re: Scientific claims in the Koran

#37  Postby Shrunk » Aug 22, 2013 3:31 pm

Muslim apologist Hamza Tzortzis, author of a popular "paper" on embryology in the Quran, has now admitted that the argument that the Quran contains miraculous accurate scientific claims is false:

http://www.rationalskepticism.org/islam ... 41106.html
"A community is infinitely more brutalised by the habitual employment of punishment than it is by the occasional occurrence of crime." -Oscar Wilde
User avatar
Shrunk
 
Posts: 26170
Age: 59
Male

Country: Canada
Canada (ca)
Print view this post

Re: Scientific claims in the Koran

#38  Postby Scot Dutchy » Aug 22, 2013 3:35 pm

Nice one. :thumbup:

Now the rest of the rag.
Myths in islam Women and islam Musilm opinion polls


"Religion is excellent stuff for keeping common people quiet.” — Napoleon Bonaparte
User avatar
Scot Dutchy
 
Posts: 43119
Age: 75
Male

Country: Nederland
European Union (eur)
Print view this post

Previous

Return to Islam

Who is online

Users viewing this topic: No registered users and 1 guest