paarsurrey wrote:

z8000783 wrote:

paarsurrey wrote:

z8000783 wrote: You have looked at the verses, probably in the original Arabic,
John

Hi friend "z8000783"

I have opened a thread at my blog titled "Quran is neither ambiguous nor contradictory" . I have pasted the verses in question:

http://paarsurrey.wordpress.com/2010/03 ... radictory/

Since I am restricted here; you or anyone of my friends here , in their own free will and absolutely no compulsion, may visit there and discuss the topic. If you may like.

Thanks

But you haven't said how the verse is not ambiguous, which is all I am trying to understand. As I have said in the past explaining you book is not preaching, go to a thread unsolicited and telling someone to become a Muslim would be.

It is all to do with intention and if yours is honest then you won't have a problem. I would be pleased to see you answer here, I will not be discussing this on your blog.

Can you also tell why is it that talking to you and ray is like getting blood out of a stone.

John

I don't think so.

paarsurrey wrote:It is your own sweet will.

paarsurrey wrote:I only informed you.

paarsurrey wrote:You may revise your opinion, sometimes. I won't mind.

paarsurrey wrote:I won't discuss the Moderators or their policies.

paarsurrey wrote:
Since I am restricted here; you or anyone of my friends here , in their own free will and absolutely no compulsion, may visit there and discuss the topic. If you may like.

z8000783 wrote:

Scot Dutchy wrote:I think paarsurrey should be done for preaching or trolling. He is quoting from a book that he claims is from a deity he has not proved exists.

Then you will bar all theists from being able to explain and/or defend their holy books, which I for one am interested to hear about.

John

paarsurrey wrote:

Paarsurrey wrote:Do you agree that the western society is not treating women equitably; as they have overburdened women cruelly?

cherries wrote:
that depends on the individuals concerned,my friend and her husband for example have a completely equal relationship.they were both working,after she gave birth to their baby they both took "maternity leave".my friend a bit longer before she went back to work.they share all household tasks.

How long the maternity leave would last? It must have been their first baby.

If they have say four or five children?

Thanks

cherries wrote:

paarsurrey wrote:

Paarsurrey wrote:Do you agree that the western society is not treating women equitably; as they have overburdened women cruelly?

cherries wrote:
that depends on the individuals concerned,my friend and her husband for example have a completely equal relationship.they were both working,after she gave birth to their baby they both took "maternity leave".my friend a bit longer before she went back to work.they share all household tasks.

How long the maternity leave would last? It must have been their first baby.

If they have say four or five children?

Thanks

i can't remember how long it lasted but it was quite long.
true it's there first child.they don't want anymore children because there are so many already in this world and the earth can't sustain so many.

Scot Dutchy wrote:

z8000783 wrote:

Scot Dutchy wrote:I think paarsurrey should be done for preaching or trolling. He is quoting from a book that he claims is from a deity he has not proved exists.

Then you will bar all theists from being able to explain and/or defend their holy books, which I for one am interested to hear about.

John

Their WHAT. The load of crap they keep preeching from. There are plenty of scholarly sites where you can read evrything about the koran, bibble and other misguided books. Why do you want hear it from brainwahed preachers who hardly understand what it means. Wierd.