One pathetic prick. I dont repeat myself very often, but this prick deserves it!

Imagination Theory wrote:

In 2010 he was voted Britain’s most influential Muslim thinker by Jordan’s Royal Islamic Strategic Studies Centre.

If this is all it takes to be an "influential Muslim thinker", then I'd better not introduce them to my tropical fish, or they'll think my fish are world class physicists.

Calilasseia wrote:

Imagination Theory wrote:

In 2010 he was voted Britain’s most influential Muslim thinker by Jordan’s Royal Islamic Strategic Studies Centre.

If this is all it takes to be an "influential Muslim thinker", then I'd better not introduce them to my tropical fish, or they'll think my fish are world class physicists.

Look, they are all men.

http://rissc.jo/index.php/english-publi ... slims.html

Imagination Theory wrote:

Calilasseia wrote:

Imagination Theory wrote:

In 2010 he was voted Britain’s most influential Muslim thinker by Jordan’s Royal Islamic Strategic Studies Centre.

If this is all it takes to be an "influential Muslim thinker", then I'd better not introduce them to my tropical fish, or they'll think my fish are world class physicists.

Look, they are all men.

http://rissc.jo/index.php/english-publi ... slims.html

Suprised? It is islam you know but dont tell Nora that. She believes that muslim women have an influence in islam.

Shrunk wrote:"Lesbianism"?!

Allah has ninety-nine names.
<snip>
The divine names have distinct vocations

Yeah. I'm really sure such exalted abstractions are behind the typical Muslim objections to gender equality.

Actually, it's no different from Christianity, apart from having 99 names. Judaism started with one, then the Christians upped it to three. . With three vocations to match: the original smiting to which they added doing miracles with food and getting virgins pregnant. Most Muslims regard revering three vocations as polytheism, so where does that put 99? INFIDELS!

Imagination Theory wrote:

In 2010 he was voted Britain’s most influential Muslim thinker by Jordan’s Royal Islamic Strategic Studies Centre.

Now, try imagine a list of most influential British thinkers, period, without regard to religion. And imagine how far down that list this clown would place.

A lecturer at Cambridge University is by definition a very powerful position.....

Clive Durdle wrote:A lecturer at Cambridge University is by definition a very powerful position.....

Unfortunately.

james1v wrote:

Clive Durdle wrote:A lecturer at Cambridge University is by definition a very powerful position.....

Unfortunately.

And a waste of good money.

Scot Dutchy wrote:

Imagination Theory wrote:

Calilasseia wrote:

Imagination Theory wrote:

If this is all it takes to be an "influential Muslim thinker", then I'd better not introduce them to my tropical fish, or they'll think my fish are world class physicists.

Look, they are all men.

http://rissc.jo/index.php/english-publi ... slims.html

Suprised? It is islam you know but dont tell Nora that. She believes that muslim women have an influence in islam.

No, I'm not and if you saw my other posts you would know that. My shock face was that this guy is considered influential. I still don't think Muslims are more evil or that most terrorists are Muslim. That is not correct information.

Islam has no truck with the hazardous Christian notion that God is male (the "Father"), an assumption that has been invoked to justify traditional Western notions of the objective superiority of the male principle.
<snip>
Islam's position is thus a nuanced one. Metaphysically, the male and female principles are equal.
And more <snip>

And Islam and it's proponents do not invoke the objective superiority of the male principle?
What utter bollocks!

Clive Durdle wrote:A lecturer at Cambridge University is by definition a very powerful position.....

Except that he just gets to spout offensive made-up bollocks to those who want to hear offensive made-up bollocks. I doubt his influence extends much beyond that discrete audience.