9 11 and 7 7 was not about Islam or connected in any way to religion, even the violence of groups like ISIS and Boko Haram are not associated to Islam.

you are a pure genius Nicko and should get one of those doctorates by post to show the world how clever you are

Peter Brown wrote:9 11 and 7 7 was not about Islam or connected in any way to religion, even the violence of groups like ISIS and Boko Haram are not associated to Islam.

you are a pure genius Nicko and should get one of those doctorates by post to show the world how clever you are

More inchorent rambling,failing to adress the facts presented.

Peter Brown wrote:
Your wrong, Muslims are violent in the manner they are violent because their book tells them to be, get over it.

And so are Christians and Jews. Get over it. And get yourself an argument that doesn't reak of hypocrisy

Peter Brown wrote:9 11 and 7 7 was not about Islam or connected in any way to religion, even the violence of groups like ISIS and Boko Haram are not associated to Islam.

Not what I, nor anyone in this thread, have argued.

Peter Brown wrote:you are a pure genius Nicko and should get one of those doctorates by post to show the world how clever you are

Given that after participating in multiple threads on Islam, you are still apparently incapable of actually understanding what those who disagree with your juvenile analysis and oppose your counterproductive proposals are even saying - never mind refuting them - you would seem to be in a very poor position to make sarcastic remarks about the intelligence of others.

You would also seem - given this persistent inability to glean meaning from the words of others - to be in an equally poor position to speak with any kind of authority about what Muslims do or do not believe.

Given that I'm the one posting the clip or news and you dog pile in with extremist views that are born in leftist apologetics to refute the religion and what its holy books teaches.

I don't post nearly a fraction of violent Islamic videos I have access too, they are far too graphic and bloody for here. You know its true as I've given a lead to someone who does for those who want to hunt them out at their own risk https://twitter.com/IHWCo

Post videos on Islam not being behind the violence if you think you have a valid opinion. Until then your just talking SJW bullshit.

Peter Brown, please do not post gore links here.

Peter Brown wrote:I don't post nearly a fraction of violent Islamic videos I have access too, they are far too graphic and bloody for here.

The fact that you think that such videos might help your case merely illustrates how blissfully unaware you remain about what the people disagreeing with you are actually saying.

= nothing to say, nothing to cite, nothing by hollow ideology

Peter Brown wrote::this: = nothing to say, nothing to cite, nothing by hollow ideology

Keep ranting and racing if you must Peter Brown, but your bigotry is plain to see for anyone who reads this thread.
I already provided multiple facts, arguments and citations that refute your ignorant assertions, as have others.

= nothing to say, nothing to cite, nothing by hollow ideology... so double down with more nothing to say, nothing to cite, nothing by hollow ideology

Peter Brown wrote::this: = nothing to say, nothing to cite, nothing by hollow ideology... so double down with more nothing to say, nothing to cite, nothing by hollow ideology

QED.

but your bigotry is plain to see

because it is quotations from the Qur'an made by an ex Muslim turned Christian, and you can't quote the Qur'an in Thomas Eshuis world, this would be so racist and so gross and now so bigoted

Thanks for showing everyone, once again, that you have no idea what anyone is saying

Peter Brown wrote:

but your bigotry is plain to see

because it is quotations from the Qur'an made by an ex Muslim turned Christian, and you can't quote the Qur'an in Thomas Eshuis world, this would be so racist and so gross and now so bigoted

QED.

Nicko wrote:Suicide bombing is not about religion, it’s about foreign occupation

Nicko, your links only study suicide bombings up to 2009, where suicide bombings are mostly carried out by locals fighting against foreign occupation. That's getting less and less relevant these days, with the rising phenonemon of transnational suicide bombers (or non-suiciding combatants). For example, the book cited in your link (published in 2009) states that transnational suicide bombing is a "black swan" phenomenon. These days though, we get more and more report of young adults travelling halfway across the globe to join ISIS. In today's world, it's becoming somewhat dishonest to still maintain that suicide bombing and/or terrorism is about foreign occupation.

quas wrote:

Nicko wrote:Suicide bombing is not about religion, it’s about foreign occupation

Nicko, your links only study suicide bombings up to 2009, where suicide bombings are mostly carried out by locals fighting against foreign occupation. That's getting less and less relevant these days, with the rising phenonemon of transnational suicide bombers (or non-suiciding combatants). For example, the book cited in your link (published in 2009) states that transnational suicide bombing is a "black swan" phenomenon. These days though, we get more and more report of young adults travelling halfway across the globe to join ISIS. In today's world, it's becoming somewhat dishonest to still maintain that suicide bombing and/or terrorism is about foreign occupation.

Not really, you haven't established that the people joining ISIS do it, purely for religious reasons and not because of their socio-economic situation.

Really, this is starting to get more than somewhat dishonest.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jihadi_John

quas wrote:Really, this is starting to get more than somewhat dishonest.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jihadi_John

You clearly do not know the meaning of the word.
And your appeal to anecdote fallacy proves exactly nothing.

It's okay, I had not expected honesty.