"Expert" on Islamic Terrorism, Roland Jacquard, has during a tv show on French television presented an "al quaida" handbook that according to him "is used by top members of al quada to organize their communication on the internet".

However, a closer look shows, this is just a guide book on C++ programming

Dear Conservative think tanks, in the future, please choose the people you pay for spreading lies more carefully..

Here is the story in French:

http://www.numerama.com/magazine/16319- ... ion-c.html

This is the tv show: http://www.pluzz.fr/c-dans-l-air-2010-07-26.html
The relevant part is at 51 minutes in.

Le wanker.

Le Dingue Droit!

"Oooo, the terrarists are coming to get you...Ooooo. And thanks for wacheing Faux."

void main()
{

RolandJacquard.isATwat = true;
return 0;
}

That'll be why the fuckwits want Gary McKinnon extradited, then.

Oh no, they're on to us!!

BlackBart wrote:void main()
{

RolandJacquard.isATwat = true;
return 0;
}

tut tut
Returning an int from a void function and accessing a variable thats not only uninitialised but undeclared!

I admit i'm one of the dodgy types the video is on about and the world should tremble...i've been at it for years. A few clients may offer the opinion my work is indistinguishable in its random devastation compared to the real bad guys!

The C++ must mean extra extra conservative.

And the stupid looms over Jacquard.

Jumbo wrote:

BlackBart wrote:void main()
{

RolandJacquard.isATwat = true;
return 0;
}

tut tut
Returning an int from a void function and accessing a variable thats not only uninitialised but undeclared!

I admit i'm one of the dodgy types the video is on about and the world should tremble...i've been at it for years. A few clients may offer the opinion my work is indistinguishable in its random devastation compared to the real bad guys!

main(v,c)char**c;{for(v[c++]="Bad Programming is bad!\n)";(!!c)[*c]&&(v--||--c&&execlp(*c,*c,c[!!c]+!!c,!c));**c=!c)write(!!*c,*c,!!**c);}

Apologies in advance to people for drifting

Dr. Kwaltz wrote:

main(v,c)char**c;{for(v[c++]="Bad Programming is bad!\n)";(!!c)[*c]&&(v--||--c&&execlp(*c,*c,c[!!c]+!!c,!c));**c=!c)write(!!*c,*c,!!**c);}

Holy illegal indirection Batman!


Now if you want true c++ terror then this is apparently competition winning coding horror! (It compiles with plenty of warnings but no errors)

#include <stdio.h>
main(int t,char _,char *a)
{
return!0<t?t<3?main(-79,-13,a+main(-87,1-_,main(-86, 0, a+1 )+a)):1,t<_?main(t+1, _, a ):3,main ( -94, -27+t, a )&&t== 2 ?_<13 ?main ( 2, _+1, "%s %d %d\n" ):9:16:t<0?t<-72?main(_,t,"@n'+,#'/*{}w+/w#cdnr/+,{}r/*de}+,/*{*+,/w{%+,/w#q#n+,/#{l,+,/n{n+\,/+#n+,/#;#q#n+,/+k#;*+,/'r :'d*'3,}{w+K w'K:'+}e#';dq#'l q#'+d'K#!/\+k#;q#'r}eKK#}w'r}eKK{nl]'/#;#q#n'){)#}w'){){nl]'/+#n';d}rw' i;# ){n\l]!/n{n#'; r{#w'r nc{nl]'/#{l,+'K {rw' iK{;[{nl]'/w#q#\ n'wk nw'iwk{KK{nl]!/w{%'l##w#' i; :{nl]'/*{q#'ld;r'}{nlwb!/*de}'c \;;{nl'-{}rw]'/+,}##'*}#nc,',#nw]'/+kd'+e}+;\#'rdq#w! nr'/ ') }+}{rl#'{n' ')# }'+}##(!!/") :t<-50?_==*a?putchar(a[31]):main(-65,_,a+1):main((*a == '/')+t,_,a+1 ):0<t?main ( 2, 2 , "%s"):*a=='/'||main(0,main(-61,*a, "!ek;dc \i@bK'(q)-[w]*%n+r3#l,{}:\nuwloca-O;m .vpbks,fxntdCeghiry"),a+1);
}

Jumbo wrote:Apologies in advance to people for drifting

Dr. Kwaltz wrote:

main(v,c)char**c;{for(v[c++]="Bad Programming is bad!\n)";(!!c)[*c]&&(v--||--c&&execlp(*c,*c,c[!!c]+!!c,!c));**c=!c)write(!!*c,*c,!!**c);}

Holy illegal indirection Batman!


Now if you want true c++ terror then this is apparently competition winning coding horror! (It compiles with plenty of warnings but no errors)

#include <stdio.h>
main(int t,char _,char *a)
{
return!0<t?t<3?main(-79,-13,a+main(-87,1-_,main(-86, 0, a+1 )+a)):1,t<_?main(t+1, _, a ):3,main ( -94, -27+t, a )&&t== 2 ?_<13 ?main ( 2, _+1, "%s %d %d\n" ):9:16:t<0?t<-72?main(_,t,"@n'+,#'/*{}w+/w#cdnr/+,{}r/*de}+,/*{*+,/w{%+,/w#q#n+,/#{l,+,/n{n+\,/+#n+,/#;#q#n+,/+k#;*+,/'r :'d*'3,}{w+K w'K:'+}e#';dq#'l q#'+d'K#!/\+k#;q#'r}eKK#}w'r}eKK{nl]'/#;#q#n'){)#}w'){){nl]'/+#n';d}rw' i;# ){n\l]!/n{n#'; r{#w'r nc{nl]'/#{l,+'K {rw' iK{;[{nl]'/w#q#\ n'wk nw'iwk{KK{nl]!/w{%'l##w#' i; :{nl]'/*{q#'ld;r'}{nlwb!/*de}'c \;;{nl'-{}rw]'/+,}##'*}#nc,',#nw]'/+kd'+e}+;\#'rdq#w! nr'/ ') }+}{rl#'{n' ')# }'+}##(!!/") :t<-50?_==*a?putchar(a[31]):main(-65,_,a+1):main((*a == '/')+t,_,a+1 ):0<t?main ( 2, 2 , "%s"):*a=='/'||main(0,main(-61,*a, "!ek;dc \i@bK'(q)-[w]*%n+r3#l,{}:\nuwloca-O;m .vpbks,fxntdCeghiry"),a+1);
}

Starts getting too complex, I am all for simplicity...
Don't enter this in a Bash shell:

Code: Select all

:(){ :|:& };:


Jumbo wrote:Now if you want true c++ terror then this is apparently competition winning coding horror! (It compiles with plenty of warnings but no errors)

#include <stdio.h>
main(int t,char _,char *a)
{
return!0<t?t<3?main(-79,-13,a+main(-87,1-_,main(-86, 0, a+1 )+a)):1,t<_?main(t+1, _, a ):3,main ( -94, -27+t, a )&&t== 2 ?_<13 ?main ( 2, _+1, "%s %d %d\n" ):9:16:t<0?t<-72?main(_,t,"@n'+,#'/*{}w+/w#cdnr/+,{}r/*de}+,/*{*+,/w{%+,/w#q#n+,/#{l,+,/n{n+\,/+#n+,/#;#q#n+,/+k#;*+,/'r :'d*'3,}{w+K w'K:'+}e#';dq#'l q#'+d'K#!/\+k#;q#'r}eKK#}w'r}eKK{nl]'/#;#q#n'){)#}w'){){nl]'/+#n';d}rw' i;# ){n\l]!/n{n#'; r{#w'r nc{nl]'/#{l,+'K {rw' iK{;[{nl]'/w#q#\ n'wk nw'iwk{KK{nl]!/w{%'l##w#' i; :{nl]'/*{q#'ld;r'}{nlwb!/*de}'c \;;{nl'-{}rw]'/+,}##'*}#nc,',#nw]'/+kd'+e}+;\#'rdq#w! nr'/ ') }+}{rl#'{n' ')# }'+}##(!!/") :t<-50?_==*a?putchar(a[31]):main(-65,_,a+1):main((*a == '/')+t,_,a+1 ):0<t?main ( 2, 2 , "%s"):*a=='/'||main(0,main(-61,*a, "!ek;dc \i@bK'(q)-[w]*%n+r3#l,{}:\nuwloca-O;m .vpbks,fxntdCeghiry"),a+1);
}

Shouldn't that be an int main()?

It doesn't need the int main to work. It compiles and runs just fine without. I think unless void is set then the int is assumed.

Hmm, I had Visual Studio open just there and smooshed it in to see (yes I really am that lame). Got a C4430. So depends on the compiler I guess!

Jumbo wrote:

BlackBart wrote:void main()
{

RolandJacquard.isATwat = true;
return 0;
}

tut tut
Returning an int from a void function and accessing a variable thats not only uninitialised but undeclared!

bool facePalm;
facePalm = true;

Ash wrote:Hmm, I had Visual Studio open just there and smooshed it in to see (yes I really am that lame). Got a C4430. So depends on the compiler I guess!

I'm that lame too. I compiled it just fine on Visual C== 6.0 .I haven't tried it on VS2005 or above but wouldn't be surprised if one or other of them had a good moan about it. I think the assumed int thing went out of the window in later versions of Visual studio.

I have realised there appears to be a few of us dodgy programmer types all congregating on one website. Will the black helicopters be whizzing overhead and this site start setting off alarms in various security services departments

Glad to know I'm not the only one!

We'll just have to pass ourselves off as web devs.
Us? Terrorists? Nooooo, this is php-land, no C++ here....