Law and Order issues in the US

UVB-76 · **#21** by **UVB-76** » Aug 18, 2020 11:25 pm

SafeAsMilk wrote:
UVB-76 wrote:
SafeAsMilk wrote:You're really bad at this.

Explain.

The sentence you cut out explains it pretty well.

Yeah, you made some fatuous quip about sticking to YouTube. You are "arguing" entirely by innuendo because you don't actually have anything to say except that my claims are ickypoopoo.

felltoearth · **#22** by **felltoearth** » Aug 18, 2020 11:26 pm

People tend to get what they give around here.

UVB-76 · **#23** by **UVB-76** » Aug 18, 2020 11:27 pm

felltoearth wrote:“Law and order” doesn’t end well. Haven’t you read the manuals?

There was a time when NYC wasn't the dumpster fire it is now. I would say "law and order" worked well before then.

UVB-76 · **#24** by **UVB-76** » Aug 18, 2020 11:27 pm

felltoearth wrote:People tend to get what they give around here.

Biden's own words aren't enough to convince you he's rapidly slipping into dementia?

UVB-76 · **#25** by **UVB-76** » Aug 18, 2020 11:28 pm

Fallible wrote:
UVB-76 wrote:
Fallible wrote:Please lern type better.

Do you think picking on minor, infrequent mistakes is any kind of case?

Fallible wrote:Do have lots of fun with that, won’t you.

Yeah, because there isn't any.

Oh god, you are just terrible. Go away, silly thing.

Answer the question why don't you?

felltoearth · **#26** by **felltoearth** » Aug 18, 2020 11:29 pm

UVB-76 wrote:
felltoearth wrote:People tend to get what they give around here.

Biden's own words aren't enough to convince you he's rapidly slipping into dementia?

This is whats know as a non-sequitur but I’m assuming you get the gist.

UVB-76 · **#27** by **UVB-76** » Aug 18, 2020 11:31 pm

I don't understand. Which of my claims do you object to, and why? I'll be happy to try to address specific objections.

felltoearth · **#28** by **felltoearth** » Aug 18, 2020 11:31 pm

UVB-76 wrote:
felltoearth wrote:“Law and order” doesn’t end well. Haven’t you read the manuals?

There was a time when NYC wasn't the dumpster fire it is now. I would say "law and order" worked well before then.

No. No, it didn’t. I remember 80s NYC. Cops were everywhere. I wouldn’t say things were particularly tickity boo.

SafeAsMilk · **#29** by **SafeAsMilk** » Aug 18, 2020 11:33 pm

UVB-76 wrote:
SafeAsMilk wrote:
UVB-76 wrote:
SafeAsMilk wrote:You're really bad at this.

Explain.

The sentence you cut out explains it pretty well.

Yeah, you made some fatuous quip about sticking to YouTube.

It's where your brand of trolling usually thrives. Here, we tend to just point and laugh.

You are "arguing" entirely by innuendo because you don't actually have anything to say except that my claims are ickypoopoo.[/quote]
You aren't making any claims, you're just masturbating in public. Again, youtube comment sections is where that stuff usually belongs, so go there and enjoy yourself, you're boring everyone here to tears.

laklak · **#30** by **laklak** » Aug 18, 2020 11:33 pm

70s NYC made a dumpster fire look like marshmallows and a campfire.

felltoearth · **#31** by **felltoearth** » Aug 18, 2020 11:33 pm

UVB-76 wrote:I don't understand. Which of my claims do you object to, and why? I'll be happy to try to address specific objections.

Nah. It’s ok. I’d rather this just run its course.

Fallible · **#32** by **Fallible** » Aug 18, 2020 11:35 pm

UVB-76 wrote:
Fallible wrote:
UVB-76 wrote:
Fallible wrote:Please lern type better.

Do you think picking on minor, infrequent mistakes is any kind of case?

Fallible wrote:Do have lots of fun with that, won’t you.

Yeah, because there isn't any.

Oh god, you are just terrible. Go away, silly thing.

Answer the question why don't you?

Add it to your list of irrelevant things you’re waiting for, why don’t you?

UVB-76 · **#33** by **UVB-76** » Aug 18, 2020 11:35 pm

felltoearth wrote:
UVB-76 wrote:
felltoearth wrote:“Law and order” doesn’t end well. Haven’t you read the manuals?

There was a time when NYC wasn't the dumpster fire it is now. I would say "law and order" worked well before then.

No. No, it didn’t. I remember 80s NYC. Cops were everywhere. I wouldn’t say things were particularly tickity boo.

Violent crime was dropping steadily in NYC since 1991 but now de Blasio is the mayor and you know the rest:

https://abc7ny.com/shootings-in-nyc-har ... t/6278640/

SafeAsMilk · **#34** by **SafeAsMilk** » Aug 18, 2020 11:35 pm

UVB-76 wrote:
felltoearth wrote:“Law and order” doesn’t end well. Haven’t you read the manuals?

There was a time when NYC wasn't the dumpster fire it is now. I would say "law and order" worked well before then.

You don't seem to know much about New York. Maybe you can move to a nice law and order town in Tennessee or something, I'm sure they'd love you.

UVB-76 · **#35** by **UVB-76** » Aug 18, 2020 11:36 pm

SafeAsMilk wrote:You aren't making any claims

Yes I am. Just made another one.

felltoearth · **#36** by **felltoearth** » Aug 18, 2020 11:37 pm

UVB-76 wrote:
felltoearth wrote:
UVB-76 wrote:
felltoearth wrote:“Law and order” doesn’t end well. Haven’t you read the manuals?

There was a time when NYC wasn't the dumpster fire it is now. I would say "law and order" worked well before then.

No. No, it didn’t. I remember 80s NYC. Cops were everywhere. I wouldn’t say things were particularly tickity boo.

Violent crime was dropping steadily in NYC since 1991 but now de Blasio is the mayor and you know the rest:

https://abc7ny.com/shootings-in-nyc-har ... t/6278640/

Yeah, it’s called demographics bud. Look it up.

SafeAsMilk · **#37** by **SafeAsMilk** » Aug 18, 2020 11:38 pm

UVB-76 wrote:
SafeAsMilk wrote:You aren't making any claims

Yes I am masturbating in public. Just made another one.

FIFY

UVB-76 · **#38** by **UVB-76** » Aug 18, 2020 11:38 pm

SafeAsMilk wrote:
UVB-76 wrote:
felltoearth wrote:“Law and order” doesn’t end well. Haven’t you read the manuals?

There was a time when NYC wasn't the dumpster fire it is now. I would say "law and order" worked well before then.

You don't seem to know much about New York.

I have crime statistics that were trending downwards for almost thirty years on my side.

SafeAsMilk wrote:Maybe you can move to a nice law and order town in Tennessee or something, I'm sure they'd love you.

Tennessee is a fucking swamp and there's plenty of SJW rot there too.

UVB-76 · **#39** by **UVB-76** » Aug 18, 2020 11:40 pm

felltoearth wrote:
UVB-76 wrote:
felltoearth wrote:
UVB-76 wrote:

There was a time when NYC wasn't the dumpster fire it is now. I would say "law and order" worked well before then.

No. No, it didn’t. I remember 80s NYC. Cops were everywhere. I wouldn’t say things were particularly tickity boo.

Violent crime was dropping steadily in NYC since 1991 but now de Blasio is the mayor and you know the rest:

https://abc7ny.com/shootings-in-nyc-har ... t/6278640/

Yeah, it’s called demographics bud. Look it up.

Chief Monahan said there are a number of reasons for the increase including bail reform, the George Floyd protests and the animosity toward police officers.

"If you listen to the city council, they want less policing. They want to defund the police, but as I look out there right now with the violence going on, it's not a good sign. We need some clarity from the city council and from the communities we serve, exactly how they want to be policed," Monahan said.

"Defund the police", yeah, well, we'll see how that works out. It's already looking fantastic.

UVB-76 · **#40** by **UVB-76** » Aug 18, 2020 11:42 pm

The use of the term "protests" is also interesting btw.

Law and Order issues in the US

Re: Kamala Harris

Re: Kamala Harris

Re: Kamala Harris

Re: Kamala Harris

Re: Kamala Harris

Re: Kamala Harris

Re: Kamala Harris

Re: Kamala Harris

Re: Kamala Harris

Re: Kamala Harris

Re: Kamala Harris

Re: Kamala Harris

Re: Kamala Harris

Re: Kamala Harris

Re: Kamala Harris

Re: Kamala Harris

Re: Kamala Harris

Re: Kamala Harris

Re: Kamala Harris

Re: Kamala Harris

Who is online