iamthereforeithink wrote:Well, one difference between a hindu temple and a muslim mosque is that one wouldn't usually think of going to a mosque to just hang around, take pictures, or sit around and have a snack. Mosques usually have an intimidating "business only, no messing around" air about them, and you're likely to invite glances ranging from curiously distant to overtly hostile. Just speaking from personal experience.

kiki5711 wrote:

I'm With Stupid wrote:

kiki5711 wrote:

I'm With Stupid wrote:Looks like a sand castle. I wonder how many of the people protesting the new mosque were protesting when this was in the planning stage?

This is a Hindu temple not muslim mosque..

And? It's still a large religious building to which you can apply pretty much all of the anti-mosque arguments to (except the noise from calls to prayer).

Hindus do not have a history of exploding themselves to promote their religion.

kiki5711 wrote:

I'm With Stupid wrote:

kiki5711 wrote:

I'm With Stupid wrote:Looks like a sand castle. I wonder how many of the people protesting the new mosque were protesting when this was in the planning stage?

This is a Hindu temple not muslim mosque..

And? It's still a large religious building to which you can apply pretty much all of the anti-mosque arguments to (except the noise from calls to prayer).

Hindus do not have a history of exploding themselves to promote their religion.

kiki5711 wrote:Can't take a beating can you? Let's stick to the architecture of the buildings, shall we?