‘Single Payer Is a Rational Health-Care System’:

An Exclusive Interview With Bernie Sanders

For discussion of politics, and what's going on in the world today.

Moderators: kiore, Blip, The_Metatron

Re: ‘Single Payer Is a Rational Health-Care System’:

#101  Postby Thommo » Sep 23, 2017 3:36 pm

http://www.nationsonline.org/oneworld/t ... ntries.htm
What makes a nation third world?
Despite everevolving definitions, the concept of the third world serves to identify countries that suffer from high infant mortality, low economic development, high levels of poverty, low utilization of natural resources, and heavy dependence on industrialized nations. These are the developing and technologically less advanced nations of Asia, Africa, Oceania, and Latin America. Third world nations tend to have economies dependent on the developed countries and are generally characterized as poor with unstable governments and having high rates of population growth, illiteracy, and disease. A key factor is the lack of a middle class — with impoverished millions in a vast lower economic class and a very small elite upper class controlling the country's wealth and resources. Most third world nations also have a very large foreign debt.
(What makes a nation third world? from Encyclopedia of World Geography)
User avatar
Thommo
 
Posts: 27477

Print view this post

Re: ‘Single Payer Is a Rational Health-Care System’:

#102  Postby Thommo » Sep 23, 2017 3:42 pm

Scot Dutchy wrote:The old chestnut about the poor of America are not poor compared to the rest of the world is easily demolished.

How Poor Are America’s Poor, Really?

Image


Perhaps it would make more sense to explain how this table, which is connected in the article with Americans in the 10th percentile of income having 63% of the disposable income by PPP of those in the 10th percentile in Norway (the world's leading country for income of those in the 10th percentile) demolishes any claim.
User avatar
Thommo
 
Posts: 27477

Print view this post

Re: ‘Single Payer Is a Rational Health-Care System’:

#103  Postby Scot Dutchy » Sep 23, 2017 3:45 pm

Myths in islam Women and islam Musilm opinion polls


"Religion is excellent stuff for keeping common people quiet.” — Napoleon Bonaparte
User avatar
Scot Dutchy
 
Posts: 43119
Age: 75
Male

Country: Nederland
European Union (eur)
Print view this post

Re: ‘Single Payer Is a Rational Health-Care System’:

#104  Postby Thommo » Sep 23, 2017 3:49 pm

You didn't forget the link, it's just the link shows things like what I said - that the disposable income for workers in the 10th percentile in the US is about 63% of those in the same percentile in Norway.

That would seem to be a rather different proposition from workers in the 10th percentile in the US being in a similar situation to third world workers. Take for example Bangladesh where monthly wages are around $60. Is the US closer to Norway (the world leader) or Bangladesh (one of a number of countries in the third world)?
User avatar
Thommo
 
Posts: 27477

Print view this post

Re: ‘Single Payer Is a Rational Health-Care System’:

#105  Postby Scot Dutchy » Sep 23, 2017 3:50 pm

Myths in islam Women and islam Musilm opinion polls


"Religion is excellent stuff for keeping common people quiet.” — Napoleon Bonaparte
User avatar
Scot Dutchy
 
Posts: 43119
Age: 75
Male

Country: Nederland
European Union (eur)
Print view this post

Re: ‘Single Payer Is a Rational Health-Care System’:

#106  Postby Scot Dutchy » Sep 23, 2017 3:58 pm

From the Slate article:
Some of the figures from Europe and Australia predate the Great Recession, which put a dent in incomes worldwide. But the list should still give you a sense of how far behind America's poor are compared with their counterparts in other affluent countries. At the 10th percentile, for instance, Norwegians have almost 60 percent more income than Americans. (Their data may only be good through 2004, but the country is currently enjoying a 3.8 percent unemployment rate. Chances are, living standards haven't fallen off much.). Canadians have about 30 percent more income.
Myths in islam Women and islam Musilm opinion polls


"Religion is excellent stuff for keeping common people quiet.” — Napoleon Bonaparte
User avatar
Scot Dutchy
 
Posts: 43119
Age: 75
Male

Country: Nederland
European Union (eur)
Print view this post

Re: ‘Single Payer Is a Rational Health-Care System’:

#107  Postby Thommo » Sep 23, 2017 4:05 pm

Yes, that's the text accompanying the list that shows the US placed 15th or better in the world for people with incomes at the 5th, 10th, 20th, 30th, 40th and 50th percentile that you posted.

What I am suggesting is that "13th in the world at around 63% of Norway's income at the 10th percentile" doesn't apparently debunk any myths related to the third world or the relative prosperity of Americans.

For that matter a methodology which concludes that "estimates of the number of Americans living under $2 a day [that] range from 12 million all the way down to zero." might not be hugely illuminating either.*

ETA: * There is clarification on this point at this link:-
https://www.brookings.edu/blog/up-front ... -answered/
If we used the exact same criteria to measure poverty in the U.S. as is used by the World Bank to obtain official poverty estimates for the developing world, we would conclude that no-one in the U.S. falls under the $2 threshold.


That compares with world wide (so not restricted to the third world) figures that show Nearly 1/2 of the world’s population — more than 3 billion people — live on less than $2.50 a day. More than 1.3 billion live in extreme poverty — less than $1.25 a day.
User avatar
Thommo
 
Posts: 27477

Print view this post

Re: ‘Single Payer Is a Rational Health-Care System’:

#108  Postby Seabass » Sep 23, 2017 6:40 pm

Why aren't other third world countries hated for being third world countries as much as the US is hated for being a third world country?
"Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities." —Voltaire

"They want to take away your hamburgers. This is what Stalin dreamt about but never achieved." —Sebastian Gorka
User avatar
Seabass
 
Name: Gazpacho Police
Posts: 4159

Country: Covidiocracy
Print view this post

Re: ‘Single Payer Is a Rational Health-Care System’:

#109  Postby Macdoc » Sep 23, 2017 6:50 pm

Because other first world countries do a better job of caring for their least fortunate.

The US has the resources that other countries lack and does a piss poor job of managing them with regardto the above.
Travel photos > https://500px.com/macdoc/galleries
EO Wilson in On Human Nature wrote:
We are not compelled to believe in biological uniformity in order to affirm human freedom and dignity.
User avatar
Macdoc
 
Posts: 17714
Age: 76
Male

Country: Canada/Australia
Australia (au)
Print view this post

Re: ‘Single Payer Is a Rational Health-Care System’:

#110  Postby Willie71 » Sep 23, 2017 7:52 pm

Seabass wrote:Why aren't other third world countries hated for being third world countries as much as the US is hated for being a third world country?



Because of American imperialism. Hundreds if thousands or millions of lives lost to feed the empire. No one worries about Haiti funding wahabbists in the Middle East to manufacture fear then blow up schools, hospitals, and civilians justified by "national security" to generate profits,
We should probably go for a can of vegetables because not only would it be a huge improvement, you'd also be able to eat it at the end.
User avatar
Willie71
 
Name: Warren Krywko
Posts: 3247
Age: 52
Male

Country: Canada
Canada (ca)
Print view this post

Re: ‘Single Payer Is a Rational Health-Care System’:

#111  Postby Willie71 » Sep 23, 2017 7:57 pm

Thommo wrote:Yes, that's the text accompanying the list that shows the US placed 15th or better in the world for people with incomes at the 5th, 10th, 20th, 30th, 40th and 50th percentile that you posted.

What I am suggesting is that "13th in the world at around 63% of Norway's income at the 10th percentile" doesn't apparently debunk any myths related to the third world or the relative prosperity of Americans.

For that matter a methodology which concludes that "estimates of the number of Americans living under $2 a day [that] range from 12 million all the way down to zero." might not be hugely illuminating either.*

ETA: * There is clarification on this point at this link:-
https://www.brookings.edu/blog/up-front ... -answered/
If we used the exact same criteria to measure poverty in the U.S. as is used by the World Bank to obtain official poverty estimates for the developing world, we would conclude that no-one in the U.S. falls under the $2 threshold.


That compares with world wide (so not restricted to the third world) figures that show Nearly 1/2 of the world’s population — more than 3 billion people — live on less than $2.50 a day. More than 1.3 billion live in extreme poverty — less than $1.25 a day.


In Canada, no one could live off if $2.50/day. One would be homeless, which still happens here unfortunately. In Central America, where the climate is survivable year round without shelter, and fruit grows on wild trees, having no money doesn't equal starving to death or freezing to death. Apples to oranges comparison. I'm not suggesting living homeless off wild fruit is a good life, but it does not equal death like it does in harsher climates.
We should probably go for a can of vegetables because not only would it be a huge improvement, you'd also be able to eat it at the end.
User avatar
Willie71
 
Name: Warren Krywko
Posts: 3247
Age: 52
Male

Country: Canada
Canada (ca)
Print view this post

Re: ‘Single Payer Is a Rational Health-Care System’:

#112  Postby willhud9 » Sep 23, 2017 11:37 pm

It is also an indication of homelessness here in the states as well. No one can live off of $2.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_c ... population

Only around .18% of our population is chronically homeless with an average of 1.5 million per year being temporarily homeless.

The entire study in that brookings article takes a lot of liberties with its data to arrive at conclusions I am not 100% certain how they arrived at because they don't go into much detail.

Furthermore, I am not 100% certain these conclusions Scot is sweeping at us are conclusive. Just an evening's worth of curious google searches have led me to realize this is actually a contested debate among economists with no clear answers and both sides present pretty compelling evidence:

https://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/01/31/the-haves-and-the-have-nots/

So this from the NYT:

Image

Notice how the entire line for the United States resides in the top portion of the graph? That’s because the entire country is relatively rich. In fact, America’s bottom ventile is still richer than most of the world: That is, the typical person in the bottom 5 percent of the American income distribution is still richer than 68 percent of the world’s inhabitants.


Which pretty much lines up with what I was saying upthread and which Thommo was inquiring about.
Fear is a choice you embrace
Your only truth
Tribal poetry
Witchcraft filling your void
Lust for fantasy
Male necrocracy
Every child worthy of a better tale
User avatar
willhud9
 
Name: William
Posts: 19379
Age: 32
Male

Country: United States
United States (us)
Print view this post

Re: ‘Single Payer Is a Rational Health-Care System’:

#113  Postby laklak » Sep 24, 2017 1:02 am

Who cares? I got mine, fuck everybody else.
A man who carries a cat by the tail learns something he can learn in no other way. - Mark Twain
The sky is falling! The sky is falling! - Chicken Little
I never go without my dinner. No one ever does, except vegetarians and people like that - Oscar Wilde
User avatar
laklak
RS Donator
 
Name: Florida Man
Posts: 20878
Age: 70
Male

Country: The Great Satan
Swaziland (sz)
Print view this post

Re: ‘Single Payer Is a Rational Health-Care System’:

#114  Postby mrjonno » Sep 24, 2017 8:01 am

laklak wrote:Who cares? I got mine, fuck everybody else.


That's a very average 5th percentile attitude :).

How much people care about the poor is directly proportional to how likely people think they are likely to become poor
User avatar
mrjonno
 
Posts: 21006
Age: 52
Male

United Kingdom (uk)
Print view this post

Re: ‘Single Payer Is a Rational Health-Care System’:

#115  Postby Macdoc » Sep 24, 2017 8:18 am

Is this being ignored?? What will one dollar buy

This is tongue in cheek but has to be accounted for

South India: it will give a unlimited servings of rice with rasam, sambhar, curd, papad, 1 piece sweet on a banana leaf. - Tarun


India: ‎1USD = around 50 Indian Rupees which can get you a hearty meal of boiled rice, dal, vegetables, pickles, chutney and papads in a Kolkata 'basa' ...and it's usually eat as much as you want! - Priyanka


Costa Rica: you can buy one papaya, one watermelon, one pineapple... and perhaps a cup of coffee of decent quality. - Luis
Los Angeles: one hour of street parking - Christina
Paris: about 40% of an espresso at Starbucks. - Michael
Dubai: a dollar will get you a 'Jabal Al Noor' shawarma. - Ineke
Portugal: 1 espresso coffee. Except if you are in the airport :) - Nuno
Australia: a scratchy (lottery ticket) with the chance of getting enough cash together for your next trip - Kin


Poor people in the US and Canada ....especially urban simply pay a larger percent of their income for basics that in third world countries would cost a fraction.

Reality - 10% of Americans are on food stamps...

When Obama took office in January 2009, almost 32 million people received SNAP benefits. The number increased during the Great Recession as more families turned to the program for assistance, averaging an annual high of 47.6 million participants in 2013.

A report by the Food Research & Action Center, a hunger and nutrition advocacy group, applauded the 43 million figure in April as the lowest level of participants since October 2010. From April 2015 to April 2016, participation is down 1.9 million participants.


http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter ... od-stamps/
Travel photos > https://500px.com/macdoc/galleries
EO Wilson in On Human Nature wrote:
We are not compelled to believe in biological uniformity in order to affirm human freedom and dignity.
User avatar
Macdoc
 
Posts: 17714
Age: 76
Male

Country: Canada/Australia
Australia (au)
Print view this post

Re: ‘Single Payer Is a Rational Health-Care System’:

#116  Postby aban57 » Sep 24, 2017 11:52 am

Macdoc wrote:Is this being ignored?? What will one dollar buy

This is tongue in cheek but has to be accounted for

South India: it will give a unlimited servings of rice with rasam, sambhar, curd, papad, 1 piece sweet on a banana leaf. - Tarun


India: ‎1USD = around 50 Indian Rupees which can get you a hearty meal of boiled rice, dal, vegetables, pickles, chutney and papads in a Kolkata 'basa' ...and it's usually eat as much as you want! - Priyanka


Costa Rica: you can buy one papaya, one watermelon, one pineapple... and perhaps a cup of coffee of decent quality. - Luis
Los Angeles: one hour of street parking - Christina
Paris: about 40% of an espresso at Starbucks. - Michael
Dubai: a dollar will get you a 'Jabal Al Noor' shawarma. - Ineke
Portugal: 1 espresso coffee. Except if you are in the airport :) - Nuno
Australia: a scratchy (lottery ticket) with the chance of getting enough cash together for your next trip - Kin


Poor people in the US and Canada ....especially urban simply pay a larger percent of their income for basics that in third world countries would cost a fraction.

Reality - 10% of Americans are on food stamps...

When Obama took office in January 2009, almost 32 million people received SNAP benefits. The number increased during the Great Recession as more families turned to the program for assistance, averaging an annual high of 47.6 million participants in 2013.

A report by the Food Research & Action Center, a hunger and nutrition advocacy group, applauded the 43 million figure in April as the lowest level of participants since October 2010. From April 2015 to April 2016, participation is down 1.9 million participants.


http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter ... od-stamps/


43/232 millions is roughly 14%. 1 in 7 people.
aban57
 
Name: Cindy
Posts: 7501
Age: 44
Female

Country: France
Belgium (be)
Print view this post


Re: ‘Single Payer Is a Rational Health-Care System’:

#118  Postby Macdoc » Sep 24, 2017 1:21 pm

You are correct - was thinking the 450 millon in the the larger EU ...

We are both wrong

323.1 million (2016) - 13.3% but then again I don't think young kids qualify for food stamps so it might be much higher....and yet food is pretty inexpensive.

https://www.google.co.uk/search?client= ... fAaLvNpMAK
Travel photos > https://500px.com/macdoc/galleries
EO Wilson in On Human Nature wrote:
We are not compelled to believe in biological uniformity in order to affirm human freedom and dignity.
User avatar
Macdoc
 
Posts: 17714
Age: 76
Male

Country: Canada/Australia
Australia (au)
Print view this post

Re: ‘Single Payer Is a Rational Health-Care System’:

#119  Postby Willie71 » Sep 24, 2017 1:27 pm

Macdoc wrote:Is this being ignored?? What will one dollar buy

This is tongue in cheek but has to be accounted for

South India: it will give a unlimited servings of rice with rasam, sambhar, curd, papad, 1 piece sweet on a banana leaf. - Tarun


India: ‎1USD = around 50 Indian Rupees which can get you a hearty meal of boiled rice, dal, vegetables, pickles, chutney and papads in a Kolkata 'basa' ...and it's usually eat as much as you want! - Priyanka


Costa Rica: you can buy one papaya, one watermelon, one pineapple... and perhaps a cup of coffee of decent quality. - Luis
Los Angeles: one hour of street parking - Christina
Paris: about 40% of an espresso at Starbucks. - Michael
Dubai: a dollar will get you a 'Jabal Al Noor' shawarma. - Ineke
Portugal: 1 espresso coffee. Except if you are in the airport :) - Nuno
Australia: a scratchy (lottery ticket) with the chance of getting enough cash together for your next trip - Kin


Poor people in the US and Canada ....especially urban simply pay a larger percent of their income for basics that in third world countries would cost a fraction.

Reality - 10% of Americans are on food stamps...

When Obama took office in January 2009, almost 32 million people received SNAP benefits. The number increased during the Great Recession as more families turned to the program for assistance, averaging an annual high of 47.6 million participants in 2013.

A report by the Food Research & Action Center, a hunger and nutrition advocacy group, applauded the 43 million figure in April as the lowest level of participants since October 2010. From April 2015 to April 2016, participation is down 1.9 million participants.


http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter ... od-stamps/


This is what I point out when people talk about low wages in places like Cuba. $40.00/week goes a lot farther when your utilities are $3.00-$4.00/month, housing, groceries, health care, and education are fully covered.
We should probably go for a can of vegetables because not only would it be a huge improvement, you'd also be able to eat it at the end.
User avatar
Willie71
 
Name: Warren Krywko
Posts: 3247
Age: 52
Male

Country: Canada
Canada (ca)
Print view this post


PreviousNext

Return to News, Politics & Current Affairs

Who is online

Users viewing this topic: No registered users and 1 guest