Forty Two wrote:

Spearthrower wrote:More importantly, let us not forget that the gay pride parade in Copenhagen was forced to reroute because of roadworks and construction of the Metro vicious assaults by Muslimist immigrants!!!

Assuming there is no issue of violent reprisals in Muslim neighborhoods, what exactly is the problem with the parade?

The problem with which parade?

The one in Denmark? No problem at all.

The one which just happened in Sweden?

Did you read anything about it? It wasn't a gay pride parade - that'd be my first 'problem' with it.

Forty Two wrote:

Shrunk wrote:

Spearthrower wrote:

Veida wrote:I'm not an expert on the particular laws in play here, but I would have been very surprised if the march had been cancelled. As far as I know, the only valid reason for canceling something like this is if the police expects so much trouble that they don't expect they'll be able to handle the situation.

Quite. But there was a lot of agitating by people that the 'Left' (capital L) were trying to have it banned.

And the organizers arrested! Forty Two even gave us the names of the people who were agitating for this to happen. I wonder what went wrong. Any insight, Forty Two?

Oh, you mean, nobody was upset about the proposed parade?

I believe your critical source Blazingcatfur, the Canadian blogger and agitator against those slanty-eyed foreigners, was upset. Not exactly sure who he was upset with, but I'm sure he'll write another blog entry soon which will help explain.

Shrunk wrote:

Veida wrote:

Shrunk wrote:Oh, I just realized: We haven't found out yet if any of the promised man-on-man snogging actually happened. Anyone know?

They didn't show any on the news.

So I don't know anything about this Sjunnesson fellow. Is he gay? If not, why was he chanting, “We're here, we're queer, get used to it"?

He probably is gay - it seems that most people who publicly call for discrimination against gays are secretly fantasizing about a little homo back door action.

Well, I don 't really know if he's gay. But since he's been cooperating closely with clearly anti-gay people before, you have to wonder where his pride was at that time.

Well, this is awkward....

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-33726634

For the Blazingcatfur Brigade.

Spearthrower wrote:Well, this is awkward....

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-33726634

For the Blazingcatfur Brigade.

Probably not. I'm sure twats like him are equally capable of anti-Semitism.

OlivierK wrote:

Spearthrower wrote:Well, this is awkward....

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-33726634

For the Blazingcatfur Brigade.

Probably not. I'm sure twats like him are equally capable of anti-Semitism.

Actually, no. I took a scan through his blog and found that he had two main areas of interest - 1) anti-Muslim/anti-immigration 2) pro-Christian/Judaism articles.

I guess he's some kind of Christian fundie.

Spearthrower wrote:

OlivierK wrote:

Spearthrower wrote:Well, this is awkward....

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-33726634

For the Blazingcatfur Brigade.

Probably not. I'm sure twats like him are equally capable of anti-Semitism.

Actually, no. I took a scan through his blog and found that he had two main areas of interest - 1) anti-Muslim/anti-immigration 2) pro-Christian/Judaism articles.

I guess he's some kind of Christian fundie.

Yes. I think it's sort of a marriage of convenience, in that anti-Muslim zealots are able to capitalize on the anti-Semitism of many Muslim extremists to make common cause with Jewish people and thereby make it look like they are defending the rights of Jews, whereas that is not their concern at all. The "Sweden Democrats" seem to have been trying to exploit gays in the same way. But it didn't go all that well.