tuco wrote: because of the fucking content right holders? they can just fuck off.
Why?
Moderators: kiore, Blip, The_Metatron
Alan B wrote:tuco wrote:How is it milking elderly? Its meant for people who are young today and expected not to be elderly at <70.
No country in the world I know of has this, pensions in 2060, figured out and every proposal of "pension reform" I have seen includes rising retirement age as one of mechanisms.
IMO the age itself is irrelevant, what is relevant is hmm productive age.
It is a false assumption that if one lives longer then the mental and physical faculties will be extended pro rata. Decline in one's faculties will occur, very largely, according to one's genetic make-up regardless of medical and dietary advances that keeps one alive for longer.
As the Americans learned so painfully in Earth's final century, free flow of information is the only safeguard against tyranny. The once-chained people whose leaders at last lose their grip on information flow will soon burst with freedom and vitality, but the free nation gradually constricting its grip on public discourse has begun its rapid slide into despotism. Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart he dreams himself your master.
Raising retirement ages
Increasing the economic contribution of older
workers is an important measure for European
and UK governments to consider, given the
potential higher levels of educational and
health status of successive future cohorts.
This is particularly the case in those European
countries where early retirement rates are
high. However the effects of enhanced
workforce participation to age 65 will be
realised by 2025, and further extensions to
age 70 or older would then be required[17].
tuco wrote:If you really want to debate it seriously allow me to suggest starting new thread. I do not like to do that or rather I will not do that.
Return to News, Politics & Current Affairs
Users viewing this topic: No registered users and 1 guest