Stanfords new definition of atheism

Still bullshit

Atheism, secularism & freethought etc.

Moderators: kiore, Blip, The_Metatron

Re: Stanfords new definition of atheism

#281  Postby Thomas Eshuis » Aug 18, 2017 9:29 am

Scot Dutchy wrote:Sorry it has nothing to do with belief or non-belief. I dont have a lack of belief in deities. I just dont see the evidence to prove their existence.

Do you know what lack of belief means Scot?
"Respect for personal beliefs = "I am going to tell you all what I think of YOU, but don't dare retort and tell what you think of ME because...it's my personal belief". Hmm. A bully's charter and no mistake."
User avatar
Thomas Eshuis
THREAD STARTER
 
Name: Thomas Eshuis
Posts: 31091
Age: 34
Male

Country: Netherlands
European Union (eur)
Print view this post

Re: Stanfords new definition of atheism

#282  Postby Scot Dutchy » Aug 18, 2017 10:10 am

Do you know what atheism means? Without deities. Nothing to do with belief. You are falling into the theist trap.
Myths in islam Women and islam Musilm opinion polls


"Religion is excellent stuff for keeping common people quiet.” — Napoleon Bonaparte
User avatar
Scot Dutchy
 
Posts: 43119
Age: 75
Male

Country: Nederland
European Union (eur)
Print view this post

Re: Stanfords new definition of atheism

#283  Postby Fallible » Aug 18, 2017 10:13 am

No, not without deities, without theism, theism being the BELIEF in the existence of gods.
She battled through in every kind of tribulation,
She revelled in adventure and imagination.
She never listened to no hater, liar,
Breaking boundaries and chasing fire.
Oh, my my! Oh my, she flies!
User avatar
Fallible
RS Donator
 
Name: Alice Pooper
Posts: 51607
Age: 51
Female

Country: Engerland na na
Canada (ca)
Print view this post

Re: Stanfords new definition of atheism

#284  Postby Scot Dutchy » Aug 18, 2017 10:18 am

What has belief got to do with anything? It is purely a religious term. It is the same a faith. Two very subjective words that have no purpose.
Myths in islam Women and islam Musilm opinion polls


"Religion is excellent stuff for keeping common people quiet.” — Napoleon Bonaparte
User avatar
Scot Dutchy
 
Posts: 43119
Age: 75
Male

Country: Nederland
European Union (eur)
Print view this post

Re: Stanfords new definition of atheism

#285  Postby Fallible » Aug 18, 2017 10:24 am

Belief has got to do with the word atheism. This has already been explained.
She battled through in every kind of tribulation,
She revelled in adventure and imagination.
She never listened to no hater, liar,
Breaking boundaries and chasing fire.
Oh, my my! Oh my, she flies!
User avatar
Fallible
RS Donator
 
Name: Alice Pooper
Posts: 51607
Age: 51
Female

Country: Engerland na na
Canada (ca)
Print view this post

Re: Stanfords new definition of atheism

#286  Postby Thomas Eshuis » Aug 18, 2017 10:36 am

Scot Dutchy wrote:What has belief got to do with anything? It is purely a religious term.

No, that would be faith.
Belief is a generic term for anything you think/accept as true.
For example, you believe the sun will rise tomorrow, or believe that your family loves you.

Scot Dutchy wrote: It is the same a faith. Two very subjective words that have no purpose.

It's not the same, faith is believing in things without evidence.
Faith is always a belief, but a belief isn't necessarily based on faith.
Last edited by Thomas Eshuis on Aug 18, 2017 12:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"Respect for personal beliefs = "I am going to tell you all what I think of YOU, but don't dare retort and tell what you think of ME because...it's my personal belief". Hmm. A bully's charter and no mistake."
User avatar
Thomas Eshuis
THREAD STARTER
 
Name: Thomas Eshuis
Posts: 31091
Age: 34
Male

Country: Netherlands
European Union (eur)
Print view this post

Re: Stanfords new definition of atheism

#287  Postby DavidMcC » Aug 18, 2017 11:35 am

Thomas Eshuis wrote:
Scot Dutchy wrote:What has belief got to do with anything? It is purely a religious term.

No, that would be faith.
Belief is a generic terms for anything you think/accept as true.
For example, you believe the sun will rise tomorrow, or believe that your family loves you.

...

Absolutely. Perhaps SD needs a better English dictionary! :coffee:
May The Voice be with you!
DavidMcC
 
Name: David McCulloch
Posts: 14913
Age: 70
Male

Country: United Kigdom
United Kingdom (uk)
Print view this post

Re: Stanfords new definition of atheism

#288  Postby scott1328 » Aug 18, 2017 1:10 pm

a-theos means "without God"
a-theism means "without belief in God"
User avatar
scott1328
 
Name: Some call me... Tim
Posts: 8849
Male

United States (us)
Print view this post

Re: Stanfords new definition of atheism

#289  Postby Scot Dutchy » Aug 18, 2017 2:09 pm

DavidMcC wrote:
Thomas Eshuis wrote:
Scot Dutchy wrote:What has belief got to do with anything? It is purely a religious term.

No, that would be faith.
Belief is a generic terms for anything you think/accept as true.
For example, you believe the sun will rise tomorrow, or believe that your family loves you.

...

Absolutely. Perhaps SD needs a better English dictionary! :coffee:


I dont like being called SD for well known reasons. Please dont.
Myths in islam Women and islam Musilm opinion polls


"Religion is excellent stuff for keeping common people quiet.” — Napoleon Bonaparte
User avatar
Scot Dutchy
 
Posts: 43119
Age: 75
Male

Country: Nederland
European Union (eur)
Print view this post

Re: Stanfords new definition of atheism

#290  Postby Scot Dutchy » Aug 18, 2017 2:11 pm

Thomas Eshuis wrote:
Scot Dutchy wrote:What has belief got to do with anything? It is purely a religious term.

No, that would be faith.
Belief is a generic term for anything you think/accept as true.
For example, you believe the sun will rise tomorrow, or believe that your family loves you.

Scot Dutchy wrote: It is the same a faith. Two very subjective words that have no purpose.

It's not the same, faith is believing in things without evidence.
Faith is always a belief, but a belief isn't necessarily based on faith.


I find both very offensive. I dont have faith or belief in anything.
Myths in islam Women and islam Musilm opinion polls


"Religion is excellent stuff for keeping common people quiet.” — Napoleon Bonaparte
User avatar
Scot Dutchy
 
Posts: 43119
Age: 75
Male

Country: Nederland
European Union (eur)
Print view this post

Re: Stanfords new definition of atheism

#291  Postby Thomas Eshuis » Aug 18, 2017 2:14 pm

Scot Dutchy wrote:
Thomas Eshuis wrote:
Scot Dutchy wrote:What has belief got to do with anything? It is purely a religious term.

No, that would be faith.
Belief is a generic term for anything you think/accept as true.
For example, you believe the sun will rise tomorrow, or believe that your family loves you.

Scot Dutchy wrote: It is the same a faith. Two very subjective words that have no purpose.

It's not the same, faith is believing in things without evidence.
Faith is always a belief, but a belief isn't necessarily based on faith.


I find both very offensive. I dont have faith or belief in anything.

Regardless on your views on belief being offensive, the fact that you don't have a belief in theism, means you lack that belief and are therefore an atheist.
"Respect for personal beliefs = "I am going to tell you all what I think of YOU, but don't dare retort and tell what you think of ME because...it's my personal belief". Hmm. A bully's charter and no mistake."
User avatar
Thomas Eshuis
THREAD STARTER
 
Name: Thomas Eshuis
Posts: 31091
Age: 34
Male

Country: Netherlands
European Union (eur)
Print view this post

Re: Stanfords new definition of atheism

#292  Postby DavidMcC » Aug 19, 2017 2:29 pm

I don't know about Dutch, but in terms of English, Thomas is right. Perhaps they don't quite mean the same in Dutch as in English. :dunno:

EDIT: Oh, except for the minor point that the belief concerned is supposed to be in "god", not in theism.
May The Voice be with you!
DavidMcC
 
Name: David McCulloch
Posts: 14913
Age: 70
Male

Country: United Kigdom
United Kingdom (uk)
Print view this post

Re: Stanfords new definition of atheism

#293  Postby Scot Dutchy » Aug 19, 2017 3:43 pm

In both languages they have religious overtones. I never use them.
Myths in islam Women and islam Musilm opinion polls


"Religion is excellent stuff for keeping common people quiet.” — Napoleon Bonaparte
User avatar
Scot Dutchy
 
Posts: 43119
Age: 75
Male

Country: Nederland
European Union (eur)
Print view this post

Re: Stanfords new definition of atheism

#294  Postby Thomas Eshuis » Aug 19, 2017 3:56 pm

Scot Dutchy wrote:In both languages they have religious overtones. I never use them.

So you never answer a question with 'Ik geloof het wel.' Or use the phrase 'Ik geloof je/het niet.' ?
"Respect for personal beliefs = "I am going to tell you all what I think of YOU, but don't dare retort and tell what you think of ME because...it's my personal belief". Hmm. A bully's charter and no mistake."
User avatar
Thomas Eshuis
THREAD STARTER
 
Name: Thomas Eshuis
Posts: 31091
Age: 34
Male

Country: Netherlands
European Union (eur)
Print view this post

Re: Stanfords new definition of atheism

#295  Postby Scot Dutchy » Aug 19, 2017 4:11 pm

Thomas Eshuis wrote:
Scot Dutchy wrote:In both languages they have religious overtones. I never use them.

So you never answer a question with 'Ik geloof het wel.' Or use the phrase 'Ik geloof je/het niet.' ?


Nee Thomas echt niet. Ik let goed op.
Myths in islam Women and islam Musilm opinion polls


"Religion is excellent stuff for keeping common people quiet.” — Napoleon Bonaparte
User avatar
Scot Dutchy
 
Posts: 43119
Age: 75
Male

Country: Nederland
European Union (eur)
Print view this post

Re: Stanfords new definition of atheism

#296  Postby Thomas Eshuis » Aug 19, 2017 4:37 pm

Scot Dutchy wrote:
Thomas Eshuis wrote:
Scot Dutchy wrote:In both languages they have religious overtones. I never use them.

So you never answer a question with 'Ik geloof het wel.' Or use the phrase 'Ik geloof je/het niet.' ?


Nee Thomas echt niet. Ik let goed op.

Je kunt jezelf een hoop moeite besparen door deze idiosyncratische definitie los te laten.
"Respect for personal beliefs = "I am going to tell you all what I think of YOU, but don't dare retort and tell what you think of ME because...it's my personal belief". Hmm. A bully's charter and no mistake."
User avatar
Thomas Eshuis
THREAD STARTER
 
Name: Thomas Eshuis
Posts: 31091
Age: 34
Male

Country: Netherlands
European Union (eur)
Print view this post

Re: Stanfords new definition of atheism

#297  Postby Scot Dutchy » Aug 19, 2017 5:33 pm

Het kost geen moeite. Ik heb het altijd gedaan.
Myths in islam Women and islam Musilm opinion polls


"Religion is excellent stuff for keeping common people quiet.” — Napoleon Bonaparte
User avatar
Scot Dutchy
 
Posts: 43119
Age: 75
Male

Country: Nederland
European Union (eur)
Print view this post

Re: Stanfords new definition of atheism

#298  Postby willhud9 » Aug 19, 2017 5:41 pm

Great now they are speaking in Tongues. :nono:
Fear is a choice you embrace
Your only truth
Tribal poetry
Witchcraft filling your void
Lust for fantasy
Male necrocracy
Every child worthy of a better tale
User avatar
willhud9
 
Name: William
Posts: 19379
Age: 32
Male

Country: United States
United States (us)
Print view this post

Re: Stanfords new definition of atheism

#299  Postby Thomas Eshuis » Aug 19, 2017 5:52 pm

willhud9 wrote:Great now they are speaking in Tongues. :nono:

I was asking whether Scot never said things like 'I don't believe you/it' or 'I believe so'.
He answered negative while saying he takes care to avoid such phrasings.
To which I pointed out he could save himself the trouble by abandoning his idiosyncratic definition.
"Respect for personal beliefs = "I am going to tell you all what I think of YOU, but don't dare retort and tell what you think of ME because...it's my personal belief". Hmm. A bully's charter and no mistake."
User avatar
Thomas Eshuis
THREAD STARTER
 
Name: Thomas Eshuis
Posts: 31091
Age: 34
Male

Country: Netherlands
European Union (eur)
Print view this post

Re: Stanfords new definition of atheism

#300  Postby SafeAsMilk » Aug 19, 2017 6:35 pm

Scot Dutchy wrote:
I dont have a lack of belief in deities.

Of course you don't, you also don't have a lack of Snickers bars. You do, however, lack belief in deities, and you lack Snickers bars. Lacking is the opposite of having, your phrasing is nonsense.
"They call it the American dream, because you have to be asleep to believe it." -- George Carlin
User avatar
SafeAsMilk
 
Name: Makes Fails
Posts: 14774
Age: 44
Male

United States (us)
Print view this post

PreviousNext

Return to Nontheism

Who is online

Users viewing this topic: No registered users and 1 guest