Moderators: kiore, Blip, The_Metatron
Thommo wrote:Deja vu.
Stephen Colbert wrote:Now, like all great theologies, Bill [O'Reilly]'s can be boiled down to one sentence - 'There must be a god, because I don't know how things work.'
Digestion is just a label. It exists only in the human mind. What the stomach is, is a bunch of moving atoms. Those can be found throughout the universe.Wezentrommel wrote:Digestion is in the stomach. The stomach consists of the same matter as the rest of the universe, and works according to the laws of physics, which are also universal. Therefore digestion is in all matter.
pl0bs wrote:Digestion is just a label. It exists only in the human mind. What the stomach is, is a bunch of moving atoms. Those can be found throughout the universe.Wezentrommel wrote:Digestion is in the stomach. The stomach consists of the same matter as the rest of the universe, and works according to the laws of physics, which are also universal. Therefore digestion is in all matter.
Same with running.
pl0bs wrote:Digestion is just a label. It exists only in the human mind. What the stomach is, is a bunch of moving atoms. Those can be found throughout the universe.Wezentrommel wrote:Digestion is in the stomach. The stomach consists of the same matter as the rest of the universe, and works according to the laws of physics, which are also universal. Therefore digestion is in all matter.
Same with running.
Stephen Colbert wrote:Now, like all great theologies, Bill [O'Reilly]'s can be boiled down to one sentence - 'There must be a god, because I don't know how things work.'
Matt_B wrote:The question is therefore; why do you think consciousness is necessarily more than just a label for something that's only known to happen with matter in brains?
Oh thats fine with me, but labelling is a conscious activity. So when someone says that consciousness is a label, he isnt putting forth any materialist idea. Where did the first consciousness come from, in absence of a label giver?Matt_B wrote:The question is therefore; why do you think consciousness is necessarily more than just a label for something that's only known to happen with matter in brains?
No, digestion is a label. Go look in your stomach and see if you can find the word "digestion" there. You wont find it. Instead you will find atoms moving about. Thats what im talking about: physical reality, stripped from all the redundant higher level human descriptions.num1cubfn wrote:pl0bs wrote:Digestion is just a label. It exists only in the human mind. What the stomach is, is a bunch of moving atoms. Those can be found throughout the universe.Wezentrommel wrote:Digestion is in the stomach. The stomach consists of the same matter as the rest of the universe, and works according to the laws of physics, which are also universal. Therefore digestion is in all matter.
Same with running.
No. Digestion is an actual process that occurs in reality, starting in the mouth and ending in the colon. The fact that the body is made of atoms does not change this process at all. While atoms CAN be found throughout the universe, digestion can not.
pl0bs wrote:Oh thats fine with me, but labelling is a conscious activity. So when someone says that consciousness is a label, he isnt putting forth any materialist idea.
pl0bs wrote:Where did the first consciousness come from, in absence of a label giver?
Woo.OHSU wrote:pl0bs wrote:Oh thats fine with me, but labelling is a conscious activity. So when someone says that consciousness is a label, he isnt putting forth any materialist idea.
Wooberish.pl0bs wrote:Where did the first consciousness come from, in absence of a label giver?
There is no reason to believe the the "first consciousness", whatever that means, wasn't the same as any other consciousness: an emergent property of the material behavior of the brain.
pl0bs wrote:Woo.OHSU wrote:pl0bs wrote:Oh thats fine with me, but labelling is a conscious activity. So when someone says that consciousness is a label, he isnt putting forth any materialist idea.
Wooberish.pl0bs wrote:Where did the first consciousness come from, in absence of a label giver?
There is no reason to believe the the "first consciousness", whatever that means, wasn't the same as any other consciousness: an emergent property of the material behavior of the brain.
pl0bs wrote:No, digestion is a label. Go look in your stomach and see if you can find the word "digestion" there. You wont find it. Instead you will find atoms moving about. Thats what im talking about: physical reality, stripped from all the redundant higher level human descriptions.num1cubfn wrote:pl0bs wrote:Digestion is just a label. It exists only in the human mind. What the stomach is, is a bunch of moving atoms. Those can be found throughout the universe.Wezentrommel wrote:Digestion is in the stomach. The stomach consists of the same matter as the rest of the universe, and works according to the laws of physics, which are also universal. Therefore digestion is in all matter.
Same with running.
No. Digestion is an actual process that occurs in reality, starting in the mouth and ending in the colon. The fact that the body is made of atoms does not change this process at all. While atoms CAN be found throughout the universe, digestion can not.
Stephen Colbert wrote:Now, like all great theologies, Bill [O'Reilly]'s can be boiled down to one sentence - 'There must be a god, because I don't know how things work.'
pl0bs wrote:C is in the brain. The brain consists of the same matter as the rest of the universe and works according to the laws of physics, which are also universal.
Digestion is just a label. It exists only in the human mind. What the stomach is, is a bunch of moving atoms. Those can be found throughout the universe.
Same with running.
Im afraid the process still just consists of atoms moving about. There is no "extra" digestionness anywhere.num1cubfn wrote:No. The WORD digestion is a human construct, but the PROCESS that the word describes occurs in REALITY. There is a difference between a word we use to describe a process and the process itself, but that does not mean that because the label is a construct of the mind, so is the process. The process goes on in animals who do not call it digestion. It occurs regardless of it's name. That which you call it by any other name would digest just the same. Your attempt to obfuscate the difference between a name and what the name describes is duly noted.
Saying that C is a label has exactly the same problem (for materialists, not for me) as saying C is an illusion. Who is having the illusion? Who is giving the label?newolder wrote:C is just a label. All the rest of that 2nd quote is just a label. Human minds are not yet found outside of the Solar system. Same with spam.
Users viewing this topic: No registered users and 1 guest