Caterpillar evolves into a butterfly.

So your understanding of evolution IS like Pokemon.

Are you absolutely sure you're not a Creationist?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equivocation

In logic, equivocation ('calling two different things by the same name') is an informal fallacy resulting from the use of a particular word/expression in multiple senses within an argument.[1][2]

It is a type of ambiguity that stems from a phrase having two or more distinct meanings, not from the grammar or structure of the sentence.

https://www.txstate.edu/philosophy/reso ... ation.html

The fallacy of equivocation occurs when a key term or phrase in an argument is used in an ambiguous way, with one meaning in one portion of the argument and then another meaning in another portion of the argument.

https://www.britannica.com/topic/fallac ... ref1102395

Verbal fallacies

These fallacies, called fallacies of ambiguity, arise when the conclusion is achieved through an improper use of words. The principal instances are as follows: (1) Equivocation occurs when a word or phrase is used in one sense in one premise and in another sense in some other needed premise or in the conclusion

https://www.dictionary.com/browse/evolution

noun
any process of formation or growth; development: the evolution of a language; the evolution of the airplane.
a product of such development; something evolved: The exploration of space is the evolution of decades of research.
Biology. change in the gene pool of a population from generation to generation by such processes as mutation, natural selection, and genetic drift.
a process of gradual, peaceful, progressive change or development, as in social or economic structure or institutions.
a motion incomplete in itself, but combining with coordinated motions to produce a single action, as in a machine.
a pattern formed by or as if by a series of movements: the evolutions of a figure skater.

Isn't it tragic that you've wasted so much of your life on such a stupid argument?

Radio 2 if your interested. Marks time my mood.

Mankind evolves.

Paul.

Thrower does not know what subject he understands

Stratigraphy is random or selected by primal selection.

Paul.

Spearthrower wrote:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equivocation

In logic, equivocation ('calling two different things by the same name') is an informal fallacy resulting from the use of a particular word/expression in multiple senses within an argument.[1][2]

It is a type of ambiguity that stems from a phrase having two or more distinct meanings, not from the grammar or structure of the sentence.

https://www.txstate.edu/philosophy/reso ... ation.html

The fallacy of equivocation occurs when a key term or phrase in an argument is used in an ambiguous way, with one meaning in one portion of the argument and then another meaning in another portion of the argument.

https://www.britannica.com/topic/fallac ... ref1102395

Verbal fallacies

These fallacies, called fallacies of ambiguity, arise when the conclusion is achieved through an improper use of words. The principal instances are as follows: (1) Equivocation occurs when a word or phrase is used in one sense in one premise and in another sense in some other needed premise or in the conclusion

https://www.dictionary.com/browse/evolution

[quote]noun
any process of formation or growth; development: the evolution of a language; the evolution of the airplane.
a product of such development; something evolved: The exploration of space is the evolution of decades of research.
Biology. change in the gene pool of a population from generation to generation by such processes as mutation, natural selection, and genetic drift.
a process of gradual, peaceful, progressive change
I count opinion as naught.

With A single sorting process, that gives you the phenomenon to compare.

Species, planets, ideas. Absolutely not related to each other.... no way.

All brand new.

And yet we store and pass on knowledge toward a noble goal.

Socrates would say my life has not been wasted.

Charles Darwin.

Historically noted My side.

Paul.




Paul.

pfrankinstein wrote:Thrower does not know what subject he understands

Stratigraphy is random or selected by primal selection.

Paul.

Again Paul, you're blagging at people who know so very much more than you; it's really, really fucking stupid.

pfrankinstein wrote:

Spearthrower wrote:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equivocation

In logic, equivocation ('calling two different things by the same name') is an informal fallacy resulting from the use of a particular word/expression in multiple senses within an argument.[1][2]

It is a type of ambiguity that stems from a phrase having two or more distinct meanings, not from the grammar or structure of the sentence.

https://www.txstate.edu/philosophy/reso ... ation.html

The fallacy of equivocation occurs when a key term or phrase in an argument is used in an ambiguous way, with one meaning in one portion of the argument and then another meaning in another portion of the argument.

https://www.britannica.com/topic/fallac ... ref1102395

Verbal fallacies

These fallacies, called fallacies of ambiguity, arise when the conclusion is achieved through an improper use of words. The principal instances are as follows: (1) Equivocation occurs when a word or phrase is used in one sense in one premise and in another sense in some other needed premise or in the conclusion

https://www.dictionary.com/browse/evolution

noun
any process of formation or growth; development: the evolution of a language; the evolution of the airplane.
a product of such development; something evolved: The exploration of space is the evolution of decades of research.
Biology. change in the gene pool of a population from generation to generation by such processes as mutation, natural selection, and genetic drift.
a process of gradual, peaceful, progressive change
I count opinion as naught.

It's not 'opinion' Paul - you are factually repeatedly engaging in a vacuously stupid form of irrational argument, namely equivocation.

It's exactly as stupid as expecting to be able to withdraw money from a river because it is lined with banks.

That's more than a decade of public idiocy on the basis of such embarrassing stupidity.

https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictio ... glish/bank

1) an organization where people and businesses can invest or borrow money, change it to foreign money, etc., or a building where these services are offered

2) sloping raised land, especially along the sides of a river

Paul: then we should be able to withdraw money from the river, and why is Barclays suddenly so steep?

Is English your first language, Paul?

Socrates would say my life has not been wasted.

And Thales would have wanted my children.

It's fun fantasizing about your greatness, innit?

Spearthrower wrote:

Socrates would say my life has not been wasted.

And Thales would have wanted my children.

It's fun fantasizing about your greatness, innit?

By Triangulation I predict Primal selection.

Paul.

pfrankinstein wrote:

Spearthrower wrote:

Socrates would say my life has not been wasted.

And Thales would have wanted my children.

It's fun fantasizing about your greatness, innit?

By Triangulation I predict Primal selection.

Paul.

You don't know how to 'triangulate'.

You also don't know what 'predict' means.

Spearthrower wrote:

pfrankinstein wrote:

Spearthrower wrote:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equivocation

In logic, equivocation ('calling two different things by the same name') is an informal fallacy resulting from the use of a particular word/expression in multiple senses within an argument.[1][2]

It is a type of ambiguity that stems from a phrase having two or more distinct meanings, not from the grammar or structure of the sentence.

https://www.txstate.edu/philosophy/reso ... ation.html

The fallacy of equivocation occurs when a key term or phrase in an argument is used in an ambiguous way, with one meaning in one portion of the argument and then another meaning in another portion of the argument.

https://www.britannica.com/topic/fallac ... ref1102395

Verbal fallacies

These fallacies, called fallacies of ambiguity, arise when the conclusion is achieved through an improper use of words. The principal instances are as follows: (1) Equivocation occurs when a word or phrase is used in one sense in one premise and in another sense in some other needed premise or in the conclusion

https://www.dictionary.com/browse/evolution

noun
any process of formation or growth; development: the evolution of a language; the evolution of the airplane.
a product of such development; something evolved: The exploration of space is the evolution of decades of research.
Biology. change in the gene pool of a population from generation to generation by such processes as mutation, natural selection, and genetic drift.
a process of gradual, peaceful, progressive change
I count opinion as naught.

It's not 'opinion' Paul - you are factually repeatedly engaging in a vacuously stupid form of irrational argument, namely equivocation.

It's exactly as stupid as expecting to be able to withdraw money from a river because it is lined with banks.

That's more than a decade of public idiocy on the basis of such embarrassing stupidity.

Stop reality check... PRIMAL selection natural; human.; Artificial.

Basic school boy error mistaking the effect for the cause; and running off with it.

Very much the writer bott you good sir.

Paul.

pfrankinstein wrote:
Stop reality check... PRIMAL selection natural; human.; Artificial.

Listing words isn't an argument or even a coherent position, Paul, as you've been told many, many times.

pfrankinstein wrote:Basic school boy error mistaking the effect for the cause; and running off with it.

As we've established Paul, you don't know your causal arse from your effected elbow.

pfrankinstein wrote:Very much the writer bott you good sir.

Still wondering whether English is your first language, or you're running your native tongue through a very rudimentary translator.

Clearly some are unable to collect the largest vast swathes of phenomenon and dived by type.

Some are unable to grasp phrases like "inorganic sphere, ; a collective description for outer space.

Size of the sample problem.

Compartmentalize. Gather. Divide. Rationally Lable.

Colour?

Shall we look at the evidence thrower.

You took Darwinian Evolution to mean all things biological, you are absolutely wrong.

You have no credibility.

Descent with modification by means of primal is evidenced in the protoplantery disc.

Stratigraphy, ,,the primordial process here on earth.... bleed over, ; cosmology becomes geology.


THROWER....


You have not updated the subject of Selection at all. Not a jot. A man all things evolution.


The large process thought train is beyond you. Evidenced by your flapp.


Paul.

It tells everybody all they need to know that you're not even interested in Darwin's influence on physics, despite his work being fundamental to the single process that underpins ALL processes in dynamic systems. The answer you've been looking for the entire time, put under your nose multiple times over decades, and not a sausage.

pfrankinstein wrote:Clearly some are unable to collect the largest vast swathes of phenomenon and dived by type.

Some are unable to grasp phrases like "inorganic sphere, ; a collective description for outer space.

Clearly some think they can blag bullshit and that bullshit will be bought into by people much better educated than them, despite all the evidence showing that this isn't going to happen, not least because everyone else is already onto that someone and knows full well he'd struggle to tell his rectum from his cubitus, and certainly makes the mistake of repeatedly attempting to talk out of the former.

A load of organic spheres more like.

Paul's got a new word 'stratigraphy', and totally unsurprisingly, he doesn't know how to use that word in a grammatically cogent fashion.

Sticky brown organic balls emitted from the wrong end of the digestive tract.