pfrankinstein wrote:TopCat wrote:Spearthrower wrote:Statements like this show you're not a bot.
This failure of engagement even with very obvious cue words available would simply be unacceptable.
Bot: Hi, I am Botto, the friendly bot - what would you like to talk about today?
Participant: Hi Botto, it's raining today so I've got nothing to do - let's talk about tennis!
Bot: I am bonobo, eaty mcfry lambast in coco cabana
Participant: Uh, I don't understand - do you know tennis?
Bot: Tennis? Sure, I am the greatest tennis player in the history of the universe. Tennis can do up zinc following molded lepers careen akimble aboo. I have no arms.
I'm envisaging a sort of reverse Turing Test here.
Remarkable subject "thrower ; can tell the difference between bot and human, yet HS and AS = fizzy mess.
Just say in. ?
Paul.
Super dumb, Paul.
Oh you can tell the difference between a wall and a rabbit, so I must be right.
Oh you can tell the difference between heat and wet, so I must be right.
Oh the sky is blue, so I must be right.
If you're going to be this nonsensical about your declarations of victory, you may as well just keep writing 'I am winner'.
The point is, again, that because you have no support for your position, no substance to your claims, you keep looking for specious ways to claim you're right, such as by talking about what Darwin did or didn't do as if something he did means you're right.
We all know you've got nothing Paul, you can't even answer simple questions directed at you, instead spending pages cavorting around evasively, pretending to be a genius while failing over and over again.