Moderators: kiore, Blip, The_Metatron
virphen wrote:If you listen real close to the third one, you can hear my voice... amongst the 20,000 others that did the crowd voices for the orc & Rohan armies.
Steve wrote:Ah - the movies. That was very very surreal for me. I was a real nature boy raised in New Zealand and I read those books as I backpacked around and they were indelibly imprinted with my own concepts of woods and mountains. So when the movies came out I and they were filmed in that same scenery... I loved the movies...
Geoff wrote:Not that I've anything against paedophilia, but it does leave one open to accusations of catholicism...
Gawdzilla wrote:
Having said that, I am sad they had to leave out the Scourging of the Shire.
Scarlett and Ironclad wrote:Campermon,...a middle aged, middle class, Guardian reading, dad of four, knackered hippy, woolly jumper wearing wino and science teacher.
campermon wrote:Gawdzilla wrote:
Having said that, I am sad they had to leave out the Scourging of the Shire.
Yeah, me too!
I love it when the hobbits come back and kick ass!
Geoff wrote:Not that I've anything against paedophilia, but it does leave one open to accusations of catholicism...
virphen wrote:That's quite funny actually, as one of the few "liberties" they took that nobody seemed to notice was Frodo's age, in the book he was about 50. Even accounting for different maturity rates, he was middle-aged.
Geoff wrote:Not that I've anything against paedophilia, but it does leave one open to accusations of catholicism...
Lord of the Rings is more or less the foundation of modern D&D. The latter rose from the former, although the two are now so estranged that to reunite them would be an act of savage madness. Imagine a gaggle of modern hack-n-slash roleplayers who had somehow never been exposed to the original Tolkien mythos, and then imagine taking those players and trying to introduce them to Tolkien via a D&D campaign.
drl2 wrote:Cheesy as they may be, I get teary-eyed at Theoden's speeches at Helm's Deep and on his arrival at Minas Tirith, and I cheer out loud for the charge of the Rohirrim.
Geoff wrote:Not that I've anything against paedophilia, but it does leave one open to accusations of catholicism...
Ironclad wrote:I shall have to read the book once again but am I correct in thinking; the siege of Helm's Deep was not Uruk-hai** but orcs leading the wild-men?
**as in the movie
In the book, The Lord of the Rings, The Two Towers, the size of the initial garrison at Helm's Deep for Rohan was nearly 1,000, but many more were coming into the fort from across Rohan. The estimated number of total Rohirric defenders is 2,000[1] by the time Saruman's army arrived. Merry says that the force that left Isengard numbered 10,000 at least, most marching towards Helm's Deep and others heading off to the Fords of Isen. This number is later qualified by Gandalf: "I have about ten thousand Orcs to manage.", [2] so considerably more than 10,000 when the Men of Dunland are added. Though the battle appears severely lopsided, as Uruk-hai were much better in battle than simple orcs, the defenders managed to hold the fort until a force of nearly 1,000 men on foot[3] led by Gandalf along with a forest of Huorns arrive at dawn in the rear of the hosts of Isengard and surround the Uruks.
Geoff wrote:Not that I've anything against paedophilia, but it does leave one open to accusations of catholicism...
Gawdzilla wrote:Anybody read Lord of the Rings?
Return to The Arts & Entertainment
Users viewing this topic: No registered users and 2 guests