Dawkins sues Josh Timonen

devogue · #1 by **devogue** » Oct 23, 2010 5:07 pm

!

MODNOTE
This thread has an astonishingly strong tendency to go off-topic and derail into ... well, anything, really. Therefore, moderation in this thread is strict as far as off-topic posts are concerned. A couple of guidelines:

This is not the place to discuss allegedly dubious moderation on RD.net, or Simon Gardner's avatar, or ways to unite Atheists. The appropriate threads have been linked to in my previous modnote.
Neither is this the place to discuss whether 'public figures' (inlcuding Josh Timonen) should be treated differently on this forum than other members. The appropriate thread for that discussion is here.
Everyone's seen the YT Hitler-Dawkins-Timonen parody by now. If you want to discuss it further, or have more laughs about it, take it to Social&Fun (to the "Favourite YouTube Videos" thread, for example).
this is not the "let's make this thread the longest one as quickly as possible and post 'this is page 123' posts everywhere and set a record" thread. If you want a thread like that, Social and Fun is the place to do it.

Let me also refer you to this modnote:

Off-topic posts removed. Removing off-topic posts from this thread has been a lot of work.
From this point onwards off-topic posts will simply be removed, and derails may result in sanctions.

SDL

http://www.courthousenews.com/2010/10/22/31283.htm

Couldn't happen to two nicer people!

!

MODNOTE
Update 1:

Members please be advised that joshtimonen joined as a member here during the course of this thread and he is therefore now protected under the Forum Users Agreement.

Update 2:

P.Z. Myers joins the forum and links us to the full formal complaint: http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2010 ... imonen.php

Update 3:

The counsel speaks: http://richarddawkins.net/discussions/5 ... enberg-esq

Animavore · #2 by **Animavore** » Oct 23, 2010 5:08 pm

devogue · #3 by **devogue** » Oct 23, 2010 5:08 pm

And Dawkins was paying him almost $100,000 per year! :lol:

DoctorE · #4 by **DoctorE** » Oct 23, 2010 5:09 pm

uhhhh....

Loke · #5 by **Loke** » Oct 23, 2010 5:13 pm

Mazille · #6 by **Mazille** » Oct 23, 2010 5:15 pm

katja z · #7 by **katja z** » Oct 23, 2010 5:17 pm

Considering how fiercely Dawkins defended Timonen only half a year ago, I almost feel sorry for him.

Is it possible that he'll change his mind about certain other Timonen's actions as well? :think:

John P. M. · #8 by **John P. M.** » Oct 23, 2010 5:18 pm

Well, atheists have no morals, so what do you expect... :p

Timonen seemed like such a nice bloke, though. :shifty:

kiore · #9 by **kiore** » Oct 23, 2010 5:18 pm

Is this really true? It is too believable to be true..
:whistle:

Elena · **#10** by **Elena** » Oct 23, 2010 5:19 pm

Wow. And here I was thinking that the RD forum was mismanaged from sheer incompetence. :coffee:

Festeringbob · **#11** by **Festeringbob** » Oct 23, 2010 5:19 pm

someone pm jan, she will love this

devogue · **#12** by **devogue** » Oct 23, 2010 5:20 pm

In his 18-page complaint, Dawkins describes himself as "the world's best known and most respected atheist."

What a complete prick.

z8000783 · **#13** by **z8000783** » Oct 23, 2010 5:21 pm

Gosh, it's all very exciting isn't it?

John

DaveD · **#14** by **DaveD** » Oct 23, 2010 5:22 pm

Festeringbob wrote:someone pm jan, she will love this

Done.

Aca · **#15** by **Aca** » Oct 23, 2010 5:23 pm

Good for Dawkins, i guess. Better late than never

DaveD · **#16** by **DaveD** » Oct 23, 2010 5:25 pm

devogue wrote:
In his 18-page complaint, Dawkins describes himself as "the world's best known and most respected atheist."

What a complete prick.

To be fair, he probably doesn't, it'll be his lawyers saying that.
"The world's best known and most respected atheist" that is, not that he's a prick!

BrandySpears · **#17** by **BrandySpears** » Oct 23, 2010 5:26 pm

Reminiscent of Madalyn Murray Ohair's debacle.

kiore · **#18** by **kiore** » Oct 23, 2010 5:26 pm

Really although I don't doubt these things happen I wouldn't have thought a certain person was competent enough to actually get away with this.. although it seems he hasn't. Guess there will need to be a revision of the dedication in the next edition of the Greatest Show On Earth.. :popcorn:

Audley Strange · **#19** by **Audley Strange** » Oct 23, 2010 5:27 pm

devogue wrote:
In his 18-page complaint, Dawkins describes himself as "the world's best known and most respected atheist."

What a complete prick.

I was thinking that myself.

So is this to do with the RDF forum collapse? I left long before it.

Wiðercora · **#20** by **Wiðercora** » Oct 23, 2010 5:28 pm

DaveD wrote:
devogue wrote:
In his 18-page complaint, Dawkins describes himself as "the world's best known and most respected atheist."

What a complete prick.

To be fair, he probably doesn't, it'll be his lawyers saying that.
"The world's best known and most respected atheist" that is, not that he's a prick!

He probably is the world's best-known atheist, though.

Dawkins sues Josh Timonen

Dawkins sues Josh Timonen

Re: Dawkins sues Josh Timonen

Re: Dawkins sues Josh Timonen

Re: Dawkins sues Josh Timonen

Re: Dawkins sues Josh Timonen

Re: Dawkins sues Josh Timonen

Re: Dawkins sues Josh Timonen

Re: Dawkins sues Josh Timonen

Re: Dawkins sues Josh Timonen

Re: Dawkins sues Josh Timonen

Re: Dawkins sues Josh Timonen

Re: Dawkins sues Josh Timonen

Re: Dawkins sues Josh Timonen

Re: Dawkins sues Josh Timonen

Re: Dawkins sues Josh Timonen

Re: Dawkins sues Josh Timonen

Re: Dawkins sues Josh Timonen

Re: Dawkins sues Josh Timonen

Re: Dawkins sues Josh Timonen

Re: Dawkins sues Josh Timonen

Who is online