Fair enough
Moderators: kiore, Blip, The_Metatron
Briton wrote:mrjonno wrote:
No one in their right mind is going to get into a coalition government with anyone in the near future (not in a FPTP system anyway)
You've made this silly assertion before. The next time the circumstances exist, i.e. an election result where no party is able to form a government, parties will enter into a coalition.
Home Affairs: Alistair Carmichael MP
Strontium Dog wrote:This desperation to whip up a scandal where none exists is great fun.
The case bought by 4 Orkney constituents against their MP, ‘ the People versus Carmichael’ has got its dates set by the Court of Session. The trial will take place in Edinburgh on the 7th and 8th of September and will initially focus on points of law that can only be determined by the judges of the Electoral Court.
ronmcd wrote:This desperation to defend a self-confessed liar is quite sad.
ED209 wrote:No we wouldn't - because a person would have to be very, very stupid indeed to believe that a crossbench peer is a representative of the labour party. And also because we don't all share the puritanical hatred of adults who enjoy recreational drugs and sex that characterises tories.
I agree though that the exposure of another yellow tory scumbag as an inveterate liar who holds democracy and the electorate in utter contempt is not a scandal. It isn't even surprising.
Strontium Dog wrote:So far as nationalist socialists are concerned ...
CarlPierce wrote:I don't sink to the Labour fan-boys tactic here of focusing on the messenger rather than the message or we would just be chatting about coke and hookers on the Labour thread.
CarlPierce wrote:Fancy ever ranting about Labour shysters ?
Strontium Dog wrote:My advice is to ignore such people until the happy day it is no longer necessary.
chairman bill wrote:Strontium Dog wrote:So far as nationalist socialists are concerned ...
This reeks of some deniable attempt to link the SNP with the Nazis, except that we all know that 'socialism' was only included in the latter's name to try to convince the working people that the party was on their side. Still, when you've nothing else to support your argument ...
Return to News, Politics & Current Affairs
Users viewing this topic: No registered users and 1 guest