you don't even understand the role of logic. Maybe time better spent learning what the scientists know instead of pursuing puerile fantasies.

Macdoc wrote:you don't even understand the role of logic. Maybe time better spent learning what the scientists know instead of pursuing puerile fantasies.

Maybe you might actually want to put to the test what I do know?

Destroyer wrote:

Macdoc wrote:you don't even understand the role of logic. Maybe time better spent learning what the scientists know instead of pursuing puerile fantasies.

Maybe you might actually want to put to the test what I do know?

Since you obviously know about GR & QM you obviously know of Juan Maldecena's AdS/CFT correspondence. Since this is a correspondence between a specific spacetime encountered in General Relativity theory and a conformal field theory of quantum mechanics then, "When scientists can unify QM with GR then, and only then, will absurdity/paradox have been shown to be wrong." is moot.

newolder wrote:

Destroyer wrote:

Macdoc wrote:you don't even understand the role of logic. Maybe time better spent learning what the scientists know instead of pursuing puerile fantasies.

Maybe you might actually want to put to the test what I do know?

Since you obviously know about GR & QM you obviously know of Juan Maldecena's AdS/CFT correspondence. Since this is a correspondence between a specific spacetime encountered in General Relativity theory and a conformal field theory of quantum mechanics then, "When scientists can unify QM with GR then, and only then, will absurdity/paradox have been shown to be wrong." is moot.

Is it now? Well I say that God / Reality : that is to say fundamental Energy, will become established as factually distinct from mass; despite appearances of correspondence.

Destroyer wrote:

SafeAsMilk wrote:

Destroyer wrote:

SafeAsMilk wrote:
Sure thing, random guy on the internet.

That's me. I am also sure that it is very evident that I am not an academically well educated man. Oh, the absurdity of it all.

Well I'm glad you feel you know better than people who've spent their whole lives working in these fields. There is a term for that, you know.

I know next to nothing about the workings of the phenomenal universe - I defer to scientists for that. I do however know what I am talking about where God/Reality is concerned. That is why I can logically reconcile God with this universe, and curse the supernatural.

Sure you do, random guy on the internet!

Destroyer wrote:...
Is it now?

Yes, it is.

Well I say that God / Reality : that is to say fundamental Energy, will become established as factually distinct from mass; despite appearances of correspondence.

Who gives a shit?

newolder wrote:

Destroyer wrote:...
Is it now?

Yes, it is.

Well I say that God / Reality : that is to say fundamental Energy, will become established as factually distinct from mass; despite appearances of correspondence.

Who gives a shit?

All scientists seeking for the correct answers, should.

Destroyer wrote:...

All scientists seeking for the correct answers, should.

Destroyer wrote:...

I know next to nothing about the workings of the phenomenal universe - I defer to scientists for that. ...

Does not compute.

newolder wrote:

Destroyer wrote:...

All scientists seeking for the correct answers, should.

Destroyer wrote:...

I know next to nothing about the workings of the phenomenal universe - I defer to scientists for that. ...

Does not compute.

How many more times must I state : ABSURDITY has factual support.

Destroyer wrote:...

How many more times must I state : ASURDITY has factual support.

Until the cows come home? What would be the outcome of you stating that more times than hitherto?

newolder wrote:

Destroyer wrote:...

How many more times must I state : ASURDITY has factual support.

Until the cows come home? What would be the outcome of you stating that more times than hitherto?

You can always check for yourself to find out whether or not absurdity logically computes with the facts.

Destroyer wrote:

SafeAsMilk wrote:

Destroyer wrote:

SafeAsMilk wrote:
Sure thing, random guy on the internet.

That's me. I am also sure that it is very evident that I am not an academically well educated man. Oh, the absurdity of it all.

Well I'm glad you feel you know better than people who've spent their whole lives working in these fields. There is a term for that, you know.

I know next to nothing about the workings of the phenomenal universe - I defer to scientists for that. I do however know what I am talking about where God/Reality is concerned.

You don't.

That is why I can logically reconcile God with this universe, and curse the supernatural.

You can't.

Destroyer wrote:

newolder wrote:

Destroyer wrote:...

How many more times must I state : ASURDITY has factual support.

Until the cows come home? What would be the outcome of you stating that more times than hitherto?

You can always check for yourself to find out whether or not absurdity logically computes with the facts.

Computer says, "Have you tried turning it off and then back on again?"

Fallible wrote:

Destroyer wrote:

SafeAsMilk wrote:

Destroyer wrote:

That's me. I am also sure that it is very evident that I am not an academically well educated man. Oh, the absurdity of it all.

Well I'm glad you feel you know better than people who've spent their whole lives working in these fields. There is a term for that, you know.

I know next to nothing about the workings of the phenomenal universe - I defer to scientists for that. I do however know what I am talking about where God/Reality is concerned.

You don't.

That is why I can logically reconcile God with this universe, and curse the supernatural.

You can't.

The facts will tell a different story.

newolder wrote:

Destroyer wrote:

newolder wrote:

Destroyer wrote:...

How many more times must I state : ASURDITY has factual support.

Until the cows come home? What would be the outcome of you stating that more times than hitherto?

You can always check for yourself to find out whether or not absurdity logically computes with the facts.

Computer says, "Have you tried turning it off and then back on again?"

Many times.

Destroyer wrote:

Fallible wrote:

Destroyer wrote:

SafeAsMilk wrote:
Well I'm glad you feel you know better than people who've spent their whole lives working in these fields. There is a term for that, you know.

I know next to nothing about the workings of the phenomenal universe - I defer to scientists for that. I do however know what I am talking about where God/Reality is concerned.

You don't.

That is why I can logically reconcile God with this universe, and curse the supernatural.

You can't.

The facts will tell a different story.

They won't.

Heck, they already don't.

Destroyer wrote:That is why I can logically reconcile God with this universe, and curse the supernatural.

O course you can, if "god" a wildcard that can do anything you want. Just define it that way.

Destroyer wrote:

newolder wrote:

Destroyer wrote:

Macdoc wrote:you don't even understand the role of logic. Maybe time better spent learning what the scientists know instead of pursuing puerile fantasies.

Maybe you might actually want to put to the test what I do know?

Since you obviously know about GR & QM you obviously know of Juan Maldecena's AdS/CFT correspondence. Since this is a correspondence between a specific spacetime encountered in General Relativity theory and a conformal field theory of quantum mechanics then, "When scientists can unify QM with GR then, and only then, will absurdity/paradox have been shown to be wrong." is moot.

Is it now? Well I say that God / Reality : that is to say fundamental Energy, will become established as factually distinct from mass; despite appearances of correspondence.

Even without GR (and I'm sure we've been through this before), a blend of QM & SR shows:
E = mc2 (SR)
E = hv (QM)
mc2 = hv (SR = QM)
In units where h = c = 1 (Logic)
m = v

That is, the fundamental Energy is both mass and frequency by equivalence.

newolder wrote:

Destroyer wrote:

newolder wrote:

Destroyer wrote:


Maybe you might actually want to put to the test what I do know?

Since you obviously know about GR & QM you obviously know of Juan Maldecena's AdS/CFT correspondence. Since this is a correspondence between a specific spacetime encountered in General Relativity theory and a conformal field theory of quantum mechanics then, "When scientists can unify QM with GR then, and only then, will absurdity/paradox have been shown to be wrong." is moot.

Is it now? Well I say that God / Reality : that is to say fundamental Energy, will become established as factually distinct from mass; despite appearances of correspondence.

Even without GR (and I'm sure we've been through this before), a blend of QM & SR shows:
E = mc2 (SR)
E = hv (QM)
mc2 = hv (SR = QM)
In units where h = c = 1 (Logic)
m = v

That is, the fundamental Energy is both mass and frequency by equivalence.

Yes, newolder; that is how it APPEARS!!!