Corneel wrote:Dr. Kwaltz wrote:Corneel wrote:I have said this before on the other site, but I feel that using the term "Third World" in conjunction with the US is at best hysterical hyperbole at worst callous disregard for the problems of real Third World countries, in comparison with which what the US faces is merely some discomfort.
That is not to say that the US doesn't face some real problems, and that it won't be difficult for those that are caught up in this, but I'd still prefer by far to be a US factory worker that just got fired and lost his health insurance than an average Chadian villager with a 50% chance of access to safe drinking water and extremely limited access to health care.
IOW: "Third World" is to the US as "communist" is to Barack Obama.
USA is not a full fledged third world country, saying so would be dishonest, but USA is socially still as close to a third world country you can be without actually being one and it's getting worse every year.
And Obama is just as close to being a communist you can be without actually being one, maybe? No, I'm sorry, but the USA is nowhere near being a Third World country, not socially, not economically.
It depends on which indice one uses to reach the conclusion.
Third world countries have always been characterized as one's that have no middle class and in which small minorities control the great majority of the wealth and massive majorities live in abject poverty as they fight over the slim pickings that are left.
Well, that's exactly what's happening in America, fewer and fewer people are controlling more and more of the wealth, and more and more people are being left to fight over the slim pickings that are left, pushing them out of a fast disappearing middle class and into the ranks of the poor.
Two per cent of Americans now control more than half the wealth, a trend that is continuing apace.
These are the facts from which the idea that America is fast becoming a third world country originates.