noncredo wrote:Strontium Dog wrote:There is no middle round between guilty and innocent. There is no middle ground between true or false. There is no middle ground between rape and consensual sex. This is binary. It's okay, or it isn't. There are no rational grounds for the argument "it's okay to kill pigs, cows and chickens, but it's not okay to kill cats, dogs and foxes". Not even if you give the cat a name.
There is a pretty obvious rational argument for killing pigs, cows and chickens, and not killing cats and dogs. Not sure how fox ended up in the no kill list. Cats and dogs are considered pets in most western countries and pigs, cows and chickens are considered food. We, as a society, have developed a special bond with cats and dogs that we have not developed with cows, pigs and chickens. Although if someone does develop a bond with a pig, as does happen, most would frown on killing that pig.
I don't think whatever mortal terror that animal experienced in its dying moments was made any less by the fact that you designated it for food and later did eat the remains, or at least some of them.
On the other hand, it might be made
more if they have any sense of betrayal from having been a pet, but I don't know whether that happens offhand.
If it's on the table for e.g. Western folks to raise cows for slaughter then it's on the table for Chinese folks to raise dogs for slaughter and vice versa. It's either all OK to slaughter animals of comparable intellect, at least for eating, or it isn't.