by Andrew4Handel wrote:I don't have direct evidence of God and his/her character and traits. But I Just know a materialist non created purposeless universe intuitively doesn't make sense.
Nor does quantum superposition or the elasticity of time. What of it? Your personal incredulity is of no consequence.
I don't understand cancer that doesn't mean it doesn't exist or have a cure or explanation. You can derive valid inferences from existence without full explanations. A creatorless meaningless purposeless universe does not seem like a valid inference from the complex multifarious phenomenal evidence.
In what respect? It should be noted that 'valid' has a very specific meaning, and any invalidity ascribed to the universe in the way you are employing it can equally be levelled at your deity, and I do mean your deity.
I think a meaniningless coincidental universe is pointless and can be percieved as so easily despite the occassional pleasent distraction like the countryside and handel and bach and cathedral which does not compensate for mortality and the deficiencies of the human body.
Equivocation on the use of 'meaningless'. The idea that the universe has no special use for us doesn't make life pointless. This has been pointed out to you ad nauseum, yet you continue to reassert it. This smacks of dishonesty in precisely the same way as your claim to be an atheist, a claim that I do not accept, based on a preponderance of evidence.
Buddhism and reincarnation..possibly..Our genes are apparently reincarnations.
No they aren't. They're descendents.
Looked up the phrase on a lark...didn't expect to find that!
