Alan C wrote:The salt in my salt-shaker is supposed to be organic in origin? Wait, what?

What monosodium glutamate?

I know they meant "natural salt" not salt containing carbon.

Here is another one to talk about while we are at it, this will connect all the issues at some point in the near future in this discussion...

DRIVING IS A RIGHT, NOT A PRIVILEGE, here are many sources of court decisions on this subject...
http://www.policeworld.net/vb/showthrea ... s-licenses
http://www.dismissticket.com/TheLaw.html
http://usa-the-republic.com/mark%20of%2 ... endixJ.htm
http://csa.systekproof.com/?page_id=1502 (Confederate States of America, official website, Nature of Law explained)

Oh, this too:
13th Amendment, Titles of Nobility...
http://www.libertyforlife.com/law/13th/ ... images.htm
http://www.constitutionalconcepts.org/1 ... images.htm

I will respond to some of your 'comments' in a future post, and elaborate on the relevance of this, and where I am going with all of these topics (Enlightening you all to the truth of the system you are enslaved by, unwittingly, which is the cause of wars and disease, poverty, etc.).

There is that, and the cause and cure of all disease (A balanced diet of only natural foods), these are the most important issues right now I think... Law, and health of all Humanity.

(Is this too vast of a concept for the people here though?)

Pull the wool off from your eyes, please.


“United States” means—
(A) a Federal corporation;
28 USC § 3002 - Definitions
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/28/3002

Volume 20: Corpus Juris Sec. § 1785: "The United States government is a foreign corporation with respect to a state". NY Re: Merrian, 36 N.E. 505 1441 S.CT. 1973, 41 L.Ed. 287.

"The United States Government as such is fictitious and thus includes the States Government." Blacks Com. 133, Bouvier`s law dictionary, page 1215 (1914).

harleyborgais wrote:Here is another one to talk about while we are at it, this will connect all the issues at some point in the near future in this discussion...

DRIVING IS A RIGHT, NOT A PRIVILEGE, here are many sources of court decisions on this subject...

Let me see if I understand you on this one. You think everyone has the right to operate a deadly device without first having to prove that they can use it safely?

I've got to have read that wrong. There is a libertarian viewpoint and then there is just. . .

There is that, and the cause and cure of all disease (A balanced diet of only natural foods), these are the most important issues right now I think... Law, and health of all Humanity.

No Harley. There are many causes disease. For that matter there can be multiple causes for the same disease. A balanced diet won't fix most. It would be a lie to say none. There are plenty of diseases caused by malnutrition etc. but the vast majority have just about nothing to do with what you eat. The world isn't as simple as that. Real scientist and doctors have to deal with the real world and not just make up nice sounding proclamations about how everything can be solved.

As for natural foods, if you feel that way switch from carrots to Queen Anne's Lace. I think you'll find the natural food is not only far inferior in taste, taste nutrition, but is also poisonous. It's a fact nature want's you dead. Don't count on it to be a better judge of your food then the FDA.

Look I know you are into conspiracy theories, Harley, but do you understand what you are saying is dangerous and has lead in the past to the deaths of innocent people who trusted people just like you.

harleyborgais wrote:Pull the wool off from your eyes, please.


“United States” means—
(A) a Federal corporation;
28 USC § 3002 - Definitions
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/28/3002

Volume 20: Corpus Juris Sec. § 1785: "The United States government is a foreign corporation with respect to a state". NY Re: Merrian, 36 N.E. 505 1441 S.CT. 1973, 41 L.Ed. 287.

"The United States Government as such is fictitious and thus includes the States Government." Blacks Com. 133, Bouvier`s law dictionary, page 1215 (1914).

Harley I got news for you, You are the one piling more on you're own eyes. Plenty of us can see just fine because we don't listen to every crank on the web however much you like to claim the inverse.

Natural foods. I would suspect the thousands of years that humans have been practising agriculture might have changed one or two things with regard to the nature of the plants we use as food.

harleyborgais wrote:

(Is this too vast of a concept for the people here though?)

Yes, Harley. Way too vast for us. You win the internet...or a toaster oven...or something.

Some of you are friggin' hilarious, trying to argue with facts!

The "United States" is a corporation, and here is why driving and practicing law are rights:
The Supreme law of our land guarantees free use of all the public property and total liberty to do anything EXCEPT cause harm or violate legit contracts. I believe I defined those recently here.

DC was incorporated in 1871 and all the property in America was 'hypothicated' in 1913 to the board of governors of the Federal Reserve, who claim therefore to own everyone and everything, as exemplified by the recent imprisonment of a person for collecting rain water in a 37 year old private pond. 1913 is when the IRS, the 16th amendment, the America Cancer Society, Rothschild Foundation, Rockefeller Foundation, and many other agencies/foundations/depts/etc., started.

In 1933 the private bank owners who own these federal corporations got the last of our gold and by 1934 even the Federal Reserve had zero gold and has had none since. The Rothschilds are the primary owners, including Morgans, Rockefellers, and many others. I have maps.

These are the people who are in the secret societies, which are used to make plans to increase the control and wealth.

To people who have actually checked, these are all well known facts, but you seem to be ignorant of them.

Dr. Reams, Hoxsey, Gerson, and many others have cured all sorts of diseases with only diet, because it is always the cells that cure themselves, and never anything else that does the curing. One can only help and enable the cells to cure themselves, never anything different. It takes many generations for cells (DNA) to learn to use something new, which is why all drugs cause harm, and why only natural methods can bring your body to perfect health (Homeostasis), where any cell that malfunctions is purged and replaced by a healthy cell, and the body is immune to almost anything.

The reason that every single time doctors go on strike and LESS people die, NEVER more people, is because they are only taught to diagnose symptoms and prescribe drugs, but never to understand the causes of the symptoms or effects of the drugs.

This is because the Rockefeller and Rothschild Foundations have corrupted the medical and public education systems on purpose to decrease the worlds population, and if you dont believe in the depopulation agenda, look up some quotes. They are not hard to find.

All of these things can be proven, all of the evidence is online. I will gradually put it into one place.
This is the world we live in, we are owned as if property, and all the wars and disease will end as soon as this ends.
The reason this exists is because people dont know.
People who refuse to check, are betraying Humanity, because they are the ones perpetuating this terrible system.
This system by the way was born in Babylon, and the current world situation was predicted by Peter around 95 AD.
Once enough people check these facts and learn the truth, these problems will become permanently impossible.

Just stop believing or disbelieving things until you check.

This one is going to be long, and it does not yet include proof for the illegality of taxing labor, proof of who really owns the "United States" 'federal corporation' (Pretty Sure majority Owner of everything is Rothschild since 1815 Purchase of England -via Controlling Stock), 13th/ Titles of Nobility Amendment, or one or two other important things, but these are still a lot of important source facts..



DRIVING IS A RIGHT, NOT A PRIVILEGE, here are many sources of court decisions on this subject...
http://www.policeworld.net/vb/showthrea ... s-licenses
http://www.dismissticket.com/TheLaw.html
http://usa-the-republic.com/mark%20of%2 ... endixJ.htm
http://csa.systekproof.com/?page_id=1502 (Confederate States of America, official website, Nature of Law explained)

INFORMATION ABOUT THE FEDERAL CORPORATION CALLED THE "United States", since 1871:

From a speech in Congress in The Bankruptcy of The United States United States Congressional Record, March 17, 1993 Vol. 33, page H-1303. Speaker-Rep. James Traficant, Jr. (Ohio) addressing the House:

"Prior to 1913, most Americans owned clear, allodial title to property, free and clear of any liens or mortgages until the Federal Reserve Act (1913) "Hypothecated" all property within the federal United States to the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve - in which the Trustees (stockholders) held legal title. The U.S. citizen (tenant, franchisee) was registered as a "beneficiary" of the trust via his/her birth certificate. In 1933, the federal United States hypothecated all of the present and future properties, assets and labor of their "subjects," the 14th Amendment U.S. citizen, to the Federal Reserve System.

In return, the Federal Reserve System agreed to extend THE FEDERAL United States CORPORATION [emphasis added] all the credit "money substitute" it needed. Like any other debtor, the federal United States government had to assign collateral and security to their creditors as a condition of the loan. Since the federal United States didn't have any assets, they assigned the private property of their "economic slaves", the U.S. citizens as collateral against the unpayable federal debt. They also pledged the unincorporated federal territories, national parks forests, birth certificates, and nonprofit organizations, as collateral against the federal debt. All has already been transferred as payment to the international bankers.

Unwittingly, America has returned to its pre-American Revolution, feudal roots whereby all land is held by a sovereign and the common people had no rights to hold allodial title to property. Once again, We the People are the tenants and sharecroppers renting our own property from a Sovereign in the guise of the Federal Reserve Bank. We the people have exchanged one master for another. ."
http://www.babelmagazine.com/issue66/uscorporation.html

“United States” means—
(A) a Federal corporation;
28 USC § 3002 - Definitions
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/28/3002

Volume 20: Corpus Juris Sec. § 1785: "The United States government is a foreign corporation with respect to a state". NY Re: Merrian, 36 N.E. 505 1441 S.CT. 1973, 41 L.Ed. 287.

"The United States Government as such is fictitious and thus includes the States Government." Blacks Com. 133, Bouvier`s law dictionary, page 1215 (1914).

The Buck Act (4 USC 104 to 113) creates taxable "Federal Areas" within States wherever your federal government sends aid. This includes Social Security. Now read Springfield v. Kenny 104 NE2d 65. If you want proof that you are an "individual entity" that is classified as a property franchise of your federal government, read the Supreme Court case Wheeling Steel Corp. v. Fox 298 US 193 (56 SCt 773). As long as you have a link to your federal government, you are in a "federal area" that is subject to federal laws. You would otherwise be outside your federal jurisdiction. As long as you have a SSN, a resident driver license, a federal bank account, or even a zip code or a two letter federal area (I've read that these two letter abbreviations were created by the Secretary of the Treasury in 31 CFR Part 51.2, but I could not find a copy of this repealed regulation), or if you confess that you are in an all capitalized STATE, then you are receiving taxable federal benefits within a federal area. Also see Howard v. Commissioners of Sinking Fund, 344 US 624. Keep in mind that your federal legislature can not make laws for state citizens. Congress can only make territorial laws, with few exceptions. American Banana Co. v. U.S. Fruit Co (1909) 213 US 347. U.S. v. Spear (1949) 338 US 217. N.Y. Central R.R. Co. v. Chisholm (1925) 268 US 29. Foley Brothers v. Filardo, 336 US 281 (1948).


RIGHTS VERSUS PRIVILEGES:

"The right of a citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon, by horse-drawn carriage, wagon, or automobile is not a mere privilege which may be permitted or prohibited at will, but a common right which he has under his right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness." Slusher v. Safety Coach Transit Co., 229 Ky 731, 17 SW2d 1012. "

"The use of the highway for the purpose of travel and transportation is not a mere privilege but a common and fundamental right of which the public and individuals cannot rightfully be deprived."
"If a State does erroneously require a License or Fee for exercise of that Right, the Citizen may Ignore the License and or Fee and exercise the Right with Total Impunity". See Schuttlesworth v. Birmingham 373 U.S 262.

"The right of a citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon in the ordinary course of life and business is a common right which he has under his right to enjoy life and liberty, to acquire and posses property, and to pursue happiness and safety." It includes the right in doing so to use the ordinary and usual conveyances of the day; and under the existing modes of travel includes the right to drive a horse-drawn carriage or wagon thereon, or to operate an automobile, thereon, for the usual and ordinary purpose of life and business. It is not a mere privilege..."Thompson v. Smith 154 S.E 579 inparamateria.

"The Motor Vehicle Act is not unconstitutional as making an arbitrary and unwarranted classification, in that it requires professional chauffeurs, or drivers of motor vehicles for hire, to pay an annual license, but exempts all others operators of such vehicles from tax and regulation." [In the Matter of Application of Stork (1914), 167 Cal, 294,295]

‎(Burks v. Lasker, 441 US 471)& (U.S v. Grimaud 220 US 506) The issue of Jurisdiction.You will learn that when jurisdiction is not squarely challenged it is presumed to exist...In the courts there is no meaningful opportunity to challenge jurisdiction, as the court merely proceeds summarily. However once jurisdiction has been challenged in the courts, it becomes the responsibility of the plaintiff to assert and prove said jurisdiction..(Hagans v. Lavine, 415 US 533) as mere good faith assertions of power have been abolished.(Owens v. City of Independence, 100 SCt, 1398, 1980)

"There is in our political system [two governments], a government of the Several [50] States, and a government of the United States. Each is distinct from the other and has citizens of its own. A person may be a citizen of the United States and of a State, and as such have different rights." U.S. v. Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542, 23 L.Ed. 588.

Here is the often-expressed understanding from the United States Supreme Court, that "in common usage, the term "person" does not include the Sovereign, statutes employing the word person are ordinarily construed to exclude the Sovereign."

Title 27, 72.11 All Crimes are Commercial---The Federal Tax Lien Act of 1966 also backs this up...... the Entire monetary systems were placed under the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC). The UCC is the code that regulates all negotiable instruments.

Volume 20: Corpus Juris Sec. § 1785: "The United States government is a foreign corporation with respect to a state". NY Re: Merrian, 36 N.E. 505 1441 S.CT. 1973, 41 L.Ed. 287.

"The United States Government as such is fictitious and thus includes the States Government." Blacks Com. 133, Bouvier`s law dictionary, page 1215 (1914).

Title 18 USC 9 - Sec. 9. Vessel of the United States defined
The term "vessel of the United States", as used in this title, means a vessel belonging in whole or in part to the United States, or any citizen thereof, or any corporation created by or under the laws of the United States, or of any State, Territory, District, or possession thereof.

"The individual may stand upon his constitutional rights as a [state] Citizen. He is entitled to carry on his private business in his own way. His power to contract is unlimited. He owes no duty to the state or his neighbors to divulge his business, or to open his door to investigation, so far as it my incriminate him. He owes no such duty to the state, since he receives nothing there from, beyond the protection of his life and property. He owes nothing to public so long as he does not trespass on their rights" Hale v. Henkel, 201 U.S 43 (1905) inparamateria.

PRACTICING LAW IS A NATURAL RIGHT, NOT A PRIVILEGE:

I.AS PER THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT;
A.The practice of Law CAN NOT be licensed by any state/State Schware v. Board of Examiners, 353 U.S. 238, 239
B.The practice of Law is AN OCCUPATION OF COMMON RIGHT! ( Sims v. Aherns, 271 S.W. 720 (1925))

"CERTIFICATE" IS NOT A LICENSE to practice Law AS AN OCCUPATION, nor to DO BUSINESS AS A LAW FIRM!!!
III.The "STATE BAR" CARD IS NOT A LICENSE!!!
A.It is a "UNION DUES CARD" .

THINGS TO SAY IN COURT:

Harley Borgais When the judge asks, are you soandso....
What do you think I should say?
Answer: "If I tell you; Will I have contracted with you?"

First I know I need to say: "I reserve my rights without Prejudice", which means that whatever you agree to or are forced to, you reserve all your natural, constitutional, and other rights. You are not willing to waive or infringe upon any of my rights as a Sovereign Human and resident of the United States of America. But the words must be chosen more carefully than this I think.
Yesterday at 2:47am · Edited · Like
Harley Borgais Either you must have violated a contract, or caused an injury, maybe violated someones Constitutional Rights, otherwise the courts have no legal jurisdiction, and enforcing any statute, code, etc. to the contrary is the only crime.
Yesterday at 3:13am · Like
Harley Borgais So court room advice:
Step 1, Reserve rights without prejudice
Step 2, Ask which jurisdiction you are being charge under
(Maybe switch these two around)
Step 3, Ask if you will be contracting with the court of judge by giving your name.
Once you force the judge to decide on common law, there must be a harmed party or there is no case.
Yesterday at 3:24am · Edited · Like
Harley Borgais And always say NO, you do not understand, because that means something else in the courtroom.
I should ask the judge to define "Understand" I think.
I should probably reserve my rights again if judge tries to make me "understand".

Are we on the record? I don't say anything further until we are.
Me, I am a man. I am competent. I am here under duress. I do not consent to this matter.
If I am here at all, I am here in special appearance to challenge jurisdiction and to have this matter dismissed.
I believe this court lacks a jurisdiction. I want to see the supposed jurisdiction duly placed into evidence.
What, this court can move on facts not in evidence?
Where is the competent fact witness? Where is the damaged party?
Who brings the claim? Who is underwriting this action?
I do not understand the nature and cause of the accusation with regard to the elements of personal jurisdiction, venue, underwriting and the nature of the action until the prosecution properly alleges them. I am therefore unable to plea to the charges until I have had an opportunity to raise a meaningful defense against the elements.
I cannot rebut an unstated presumption.
As a man, as an accused by law I come with the presumption of innocent and I can go with that.
Me, I am a man, not a corporation or a legal "person" nor am I a surety for one.
Hey, as keeper of the records for the thing, I'm willing to plead the defendant guilty upon validated proof of claim.
Where is the contract wherein I knowingly and willingly, with full disclosure, consented or otherwise agreed to be treated this way?
Me, I see a yellow fringe around your flag which clearly advertises "admiralty matters settled here" - so again I say, where is the contract?
Where is the Form 1099OID?
Who are you people and why do you deem yourselves better than me?
May I remind everyone, Equality under the Law is paramount and mandatory by law.
Me, I am unrepresented, I don't "do Attorneys" as I have found them to be injurious to my freedom, life, liberty and pursuit of happiness.
Me, I reserve all rights at all times in all places and I waive no rights at any time or in any place. I do waive benefit privilege.
Am I under arrest or am I free to go?






DEFINITIONS OF LEGAL WORDS/TERMS:

Definitions from a 1979 Blacks Law dictionary:
Interesting examples of Common Law Definitions:
"Common-law lien: One known to or granted by common law...a right extended to a person to retain that which is in his possession belonging to another, until the demand or charge...is paid.

Common Law: As distinguished from law created by the enactment of legislatures, the common law comprises the boy of those principles and rules of action, relating to the government and security of persons and property, which derive their authority solely from usages and customs of immemorial antiquity, or from the judgments and decrees of the courts recognizing, affirming, and enforcing such usages and customs...particularly the ancient unwritten law of England.

For "Federal common law" see that title. As a compound adjective "common-law" is understood as contrasted with or opposed to "statutory", and sometimes also to "equitable" or to "criminal".

Common-law action: Action governed by common law, rather than statutory equitable, or civil law.

Common-law copyright: An intangible, incorporeal right in an author of literary or artistic productions to reproduce and sell them exclusively and arises at the moment of their creation as distinguished from federal or statutory copyrights which exist for the most part only in published works. Common-law copyright is perpetual while statutory copyright is term of years. Equitable relief is available for violation of common law copyright.

Common-law crime: One punishable by the force of the common law, as distinguished from crimes created by statute.

Notes on "citizen":
A corporation is not a citizen for purposes of privileges and immunities clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. D. D. B. Realty Corp. v. Merril, 232 F.Supp. 629, 637.

Justice administered according to fairness as contrasted with the strictly formulated rules of common law...the spirit and habit of fairness, justness, and right dealing which would regulate...intercourse of men.

Law: That which is laid down, ordained, or established. A rule or method according to which phenomena or actions co-exist or follow each other.

In old English jurisprudence, "law" is used to signify an oath, or the privilege of being sworn; as in the phrases "to wage one's law", "to lose one's law".

The term is also used in opposition to "fact". Thus, questions of law are to be decided by the court, while it is the province of the jury to resolve questions of fact.

...science or system of principles or rules of human conduct; Secretary of the Treasury regulations

"A concurrent or joint resolution of the legislature is not "a law"" Koenig v. Flynn, 258 NY
"An unconstitutional statute is not a "law"".

Equity: Justice administered according to fairness as contrasted with the strictly formulated rules of common law.

The term "equity" denotes the spirit and habit of fairness, justness, and right dealing which would regulate the intercourse of men... Gilles v. Dept. of Human Resources Development

...in the federal and most state courts, equitable and legal rights and remedies are administered in the same court.

Countervailing equity: A contrary and balancing equity; an equity or right opposed to that which is sought to be enforced or recognized, and which ought not to be sacrificed or subordinated to the latter, because it is of equal strength and justice, and equally deserving of consideration.

..."natural equity" may be understood to denote, in a general way, that which strikes the ordinary conscience and sense of justice as being fair, right, and equitable, in advance of the question whether the technical jurisprudence of the chancery courts would so regard it.

Equity jurisdiction: ...a person seeking equitable relief brings the same complaint as in a law action and simply demands equitable relief instead of (or in addition to) money damages.
"Equity jurisdiction", in its ordinary acceptation, as distinguished on the one sie from the general power to decide matters at all, and on the other from the jurisdiction "at law" or "common-law jurisdiction", is the power to hear certain kinds of classes of cicil causes according to the principles of the method and procedure adopted by the court of chancery, and to decide them in accordance with the doctrines and rules of equity jurisprudence, which decision may involve either the determination of the equitable rights, estates, and interests of the parties to such causes, or the granting of equitable remedies. ...
In order that a cause may come within the scope of the equity jurisdiction, one of two alternatives is essential; either the primary right, estate, or interest to be maintained, or the violation of which furnishes the cause of action, must be equitable rather than legal; or the remedy granted must be in its nature purely equitable, or if it be a remedy which may also be given by a court of law, it must be one which, under the facts and circumstances of the case, can only be made complete and adequate through the equitable modes of procedure. Norback v. Board of Directors of Church Extension Soc., 84, Utah 506, 37 P.2d 339.

Federal: Belonging to the general government or union of the states. Founded on or organized under the Constitution of the United States. Of or constituting a government in which power is distributed between a central authority (i.e. federal government) and a number of constituent territorial units (i.e. states).

http://www.mindserpent.com/American_His ... /sec_c.pdf
http://www.mindserpent.com/American_His ... /sec_e.pdf
http://www.mindserpent.com/American_His ... /sec_f.pdf
http://www.mindserpent.com/American_His ... /sec_l.pdf
http://www.mindserpent.com/American_His ... /sec_s.pdf

statute: n. a Federal or state written law enacted by the Congress or state legislature, respectively. Local statutes or laws are usually called "ordinances." Regulations, rulings, opinions, executive orders and proclamations are not statutes. (http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/statute)

In this article, I will be referencing the U.S. CODE of the government of the UNITED STATES – a private corporation. All CODES referenced are sourced below each reference.
...Congressman Paul claims the the only definition for the “dollar” that he’s found in the United States Code is “371 grains of silver”. 371 grains = about 0.85 ounce.
...Prima facie is not statutory law (not made into law by congress), which means that it is only enforceable via your voluntary consent.
http://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2010 ... ful-power/


HYPOTHECATION, civil law. This term is used principally in the civil law; it is defined to be a right which a creditor has over a thing belonging to another, and which consists in the power to cause it to be sold, in order to be paid his claim out of the proceeds.
2. There are two species of hypothecation, one called pledge, pignus, and, the other properly denominated hypothecation. Pledge is that species, of hypothecation which is contracted by the delivery of the debtor to the creditor, of the thing hypothecated. Hypothecation, properly so called, is that which is contracted without delivery of the thing hypothecated. 2 Bell's Com. 25, 5th ed.
3. Hypothecation is further divided into general and special when the debtor hypothecates to his creditor all his estate and property, which he has, or may have, the hypothecation is general; when the hypothecation is confined to a particular estate, it is special.
4. Hypothecations are also distinguished into conventional, legal, and tacit. 1. Conventional hypothecations are those which arise by the agreement of the parties. Dig. 20, 1, 5.
5.-2. Legal hypothecation is that which has not been agreed upon by any contract, express or implied; such as arises from the effect of judgments and executions.
6.-3. A tacit, which is also a legal hypothecation, is that which the law gives in certain cases, without the consent of the parties, to secure the creditor; such as, 1st. The lien which the public treasury has over the property of public debtors. Code, 8, 15, 1. 2d. The landlord has a lien on the goods in the house leased, for the payment of his rent. Dig. 20, 2, 2; Code, 8, 15, 7, 3d. The builder has a lien, for his bill, on the house he has built. Dig. 20, 1. 4th, The pupil has a lien on the property of the guardian for the balance of his account. Dig. 46, 6, 22; Code, 6, 37, 20. 5th. There is hypothecation of the goods of a testator for the security of a legacy he has given. Code, 6, 43, 1.
7. In the common law, cases of hypothecation, in the strict sense of the civil law, that is, of a pledge of a chattel, without possession by the pledgee, are scarcely to be found; cases of bottomry bonds and claims for seamen's wages, against ships are the nearest approach to it; but these are liens and privileges rather than hypothecations. Story, Bailm. Sec. 288. It seems that chattels not in existence, though they cannot be pledged, can be hypothecated, so that the lien will attach, as soon as the chattel has been produced. 14 Pick. R. 497.
Vide, generally, Poth. de l'Hypoth‚que; Poth. Mar. Contr. translated by Cushing, note. 26, p. 145; Commercial Code of France, translated by Rodman, note 52, p. 351; Merl. R‚pertoire, mot Hypoth‚que, where the subject is fully considered; 2 Bro. Civ. Law, 195; Ayl. Pand. 524; 1 Law Tracts, 224; Dane's Ab. h.t.; Abbott on Ship. Index, h.t.; 13 Ves. 599; Bac. Ab. Merchant, &c. G; Civil Code of Louis. tit. 22, where this sort of security bears the name of mortgage. (q.v.) http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictiona ... othecation

remuneration: noun; award, compensation, defrayal, defrayment, indemnification, indemnity, money, pay, praemium, quittance, recompense, reimbursement, requital, restitution, return, reward, settlement REMUNERATION. Reward; recompense; salary. Dig. 17, 1, 7. ( legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/remuneration)

SOVEREIGN
"Chief or highest, supreme power, superior in position to all others; independent of and unlimited by others; possessing or entitled to; original and independent authority or jurisdiction."
--Webster

"As a Sovereign, you are entitled to full disclosure of all facts."
"As an instrument of the international bankers, the UNITED STATES owns you from birth to death."
"Ignorance of the facts led to your silence. Silence is construed as consent; consent to be beneficiaries of a debt you did not incur."
"Congress committed treason against the People in 1871. Honest men could have corrected the fraud and treason. But apparently there weren't enough honest men to counteract the lust for money and power. We lost more freedom than we will ever know, thanks to corporate infiltration of our so-called 'government.'

"Do you think that any soldier who died in any of our many wars would have fought if he or she had known the truth? Do you think one person would have laid down his/her life for a corporation? How long will we remain silent? How long will we perpetuate the MYTH that we are free? When will we stand together as One Sovereign People? When will we take back what has been as stolen from the us?

"If the People of America had known to what extent their trust was betrayed, how long would it have taken for a real revolution to occur? What we now need is a Revolution in THOUGHT. We need to change our thinking, then we can change our world. Our children deserve their rightful legacy -- the liberty our ancestors fought to preserve, the legacy of a Sovereign and Fully Free People." [Posted 8/27/02, http://www.babalmagazine.com/]

In short, our government, which was created by and for us as sovereigns -- free citizens deemed to have the highest authority in the land -- was stolen from us, along with our rights. Keep in mind that, according to the original Constitution, only We the People are sovereign. Government is not sovereign. The Declaration of Independence says, "government is subject to the consent of the governed." That's us -- the sovereigns. When did you last feet like a sovereign? As Lisa Guliani explained:

"It doesn't take a rocket scientist or a constitutional historian to figure out that the U.S. Government has NOT been subject to the consent of the governed since long before you or I were born. Rather, the governed are subject to the whim and greed of the corporation, which has stretched its tentacles beyond the ten-mile-square parcel of land known as the District of Columbia. In fact, it has invaded every state of the Republic. Mind you, the corporation has NO jurisdiction beyond the District of Columbia. You just think it does.

"Our corporate form of governance is based on Roman Civil Law and Admiralty, or Maritime, Law, which is also known as the 'Divine Right of Kings' and the 'Law of the Seas' -- another fact of American history not taught in our schools. Actually, Roman Civil Law was fully established in the colonies before our nation began, and then became managed by private international law. In other words, the government -- the government created for the District of Columbia via the Act of 1871 -- operates solely under Private International Law, not Common Law, which was the foundation of our Constitutional Republic.
http://members.iimetro.com.au/~hubbca/corp_us.htm


MORE DEFINITIONS AND COMMENTS ON THE FULLY CAPITALIZED/LEGAL FICTION NAME:


Gregg's Manual of English: "A name spelled in all capital letters or a name initialed, is not a proper noun denoting a specific person, but is a fictitious name, or a name of a dead person, or a nom de guerre."

Black's Law Dictionary "Fictitious Name": "A counterfeit, alias, feigned, or pretended name taken by a person, differing in some essential particular from his true name (consisting of Christian name and patronymic), with the implication that it is meant to deceive or mislead."

Oxford Dictionary:
"nom": Used in expressions denoting a pseudonym, a false or assumed name.

"Nom de guerre": War name. A name assumed by or assigned to a person engaged in some action or enterprise.

"Guerre": War, and as a verb, to wage war.

INSURGENT: One who participates in an insurrection ; one who opposes the execu- tion of law by force of arms, or who rises in revolt against the constituted authorities. A distinction is often taken between “insurgent” and “rebel,” in this: that the former term is not necessarily to be taken in a bad sense, inasmuch as an insurrection, though extralegal, may be just and timely in itself; as where it is undertaken for the overthrow of tyranny or the reform of gross abuses. According to Webster, an insurrection is an incipient or early stage of a rebellion. http://thelawdictionary.org/insurgent/

INSURRECTION: A rebellion, or rising of citizens or subjects in resistance to their government. See INSURGENT.Insurrection shall consist in any combined resistance to the lawful authority of the state, with intent to the denial thereof, when the same is manifested, or intended to be manifested, by acts of violence. Code Ga. 1882... http://thelawdictionary.org/insurrection/

ACTUAL VIOLENCE: An assault with actual violence is an assault with physical force put in action, exerted upon the person assailed. The term violence is synonymous with physical force, and the two are used interchangeably in relation to assaults. State v. Wells. 31 Conn. 210. http://thelawdictionary.org/actual-violence/

vi·o·lence: (v-lns), n.
1. Physical force exerted for the purpose of violating, damaging, or abusing: crimes of violence.
2. The act or an instance of violent action or behavior.
3. Intensity or severity, as in natural phenomena; untamed force: the violence of a tornado.
4. Abusive or unjust exercise of power.
5. Abuse or injury to meaning, content, or intent: do violence to a text.
6. Vehemence of feeling or expression; fervor.
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/violence



The Webster’s Dictionary states that Fraud means Deceit, Trickery, intentional perversion of truth in order to induce another to part with something of value or to surrender a legal right.
http://www.abodia.com/2/United-States-i ... ration.htm
The Blacks Law Dictionary states pretty much what the Webster’s Dictionary does but adds about two pages full of information. My favorite part is: A false representation of a matter of fact, whether by words or by conduct, by false or misleading allegations, or by concealment of that which should have been disclosed, which deceives and is intended to deceive another so that he shall act upon it to his legal injury.


UNITED STATES CODES AND/OR STATUTES:

Proof that the "United States" is a corporation:
“United States” means—
(A) a Federal corporation;
28 USC § 3002 - Definitions
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/28/3002

(10) “Person” includes a natural person (including an individual Indian), a corporation, a partnership, an unincorporated association, a trust, or an estate, or any other public or private entity, including a State or local government or an Indian tribe.
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/28/3002

Title 5, § 105. Executive agency
For the purpose of this title—
‘‘Executive agency’’ means an Executive department, a Government corporation, and an independent establishment."
(Source:http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/5/105)

§ 301. Departmental regulations
The head of an Executive department or military department may prescribe regulations for the government of his department, the conduct of its employees, the distribution and performance of its business, and the custody, use, and preservation of its records, papers, and property. This section does not authorize withholding information from the public or limiting the availability of records to the public.
(Source: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/ ... 5_00000301—-000-.html )
http://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2010 ... ful-power/


"Proper names
3.2. Proper names are capitalized.
Rome John Macadam Italy "
"Trade names and trademarks
3.25. Trade names, variety names, and names of market grades and
brands are capitalized. ...
Choice lamb (market grade) Xerox (the company)
Red Radiance rose (variety) but photocopy (the process) "

"Personification
3.32. A vivid personification is capitalized.
The Chair recognizes the gentlewoman from New York;
but I spoke with the chair yesterday.
For Nature wields her scepter mercilessly.
All are architects of Fate,
Working in these walls of Time."


"National governmental units:
U.S. Congress: 110th Congress; the Congress; Congress; the Senate;
the House; Committee of the Whole, the Committee; but committee
(all other con gressional committees)
Department of Agriculture: the Department; Division of Publications,
the Division; similarly all major departmental units; but
legislative, executive, and judicial departments
Bureau of the Census: the Census Bureau, the Bureau; but the agency
Environmental Protection Agency: the Agency
Geological Survey: the Survey
Government Printing Office: the Printing Office, the Office
American Embassy, British Embassy: the Embassy; but the consulate;
the consulate general
Treasury of the United States: General Treasury; National Treasury;
Public Treasury; the Treasury; Treasury notes; New York
Subtreasury, the subtreasury
Department of Defense: Military Establishment; Armed Forces;
All-Volunteer Forces; but armed services
U.S. Army: the Army; All-Volunteer Army; the Infantry; 81st Regiment;
Army Establishment; the Army Band; Army officer; Regular Army
officer; Reserve offi cer; Volunteer offi cer; but army shoe;
Grant's army; Robinson s brigade; the brigade; the corps; the
regiment; infantryman
U.S. Navy: the Navy; the Marine Corps; Navy (Naval) Establishment;
Navy officer; but naval shipyard; naval officer; naval station
U.S. Air Force: the Air Force
U.S. Coast Guard: the Coast Guard
French Ministry of Foreign Affairs; the Ministry; French Army;
British Navy

International organizations:
United Nations: the Council; the Assembly; the Secretariat
Permanent Court of Arbitration: the Court; the Tribunal (only in the
proceedings of a specific arbitration tribunal)
Hague Peace Conference of 1907: the Hague Conference; the Peace
Conference; the Conference
Common-noun substitutes:
Virginia General Assembly: the assembly
California State Highway Commission: Highway Commission of
California; the highway commission; the commission
Montgomery County Board of Health: the Board of Health, Montgomery
County; the board of health; the board
Common Council of the City of Pittsburgh: the common council; the
council
Buffalo Consumers' League: the consumers' league; the league
Republican Party: the party
Southern Railroad Co.: the Southern Railroad; Southern Co.; Southern
Road; the railroad company; the company
Riggs National Bank: the Riggs Bank; the bank
Metropolitan Club: the club
Yale School of Law: Yale University School of Law; School of Law,
Yale University; school of law
(U.S. Government Printing Office Style Manual Chapter 3 - Capitalization Rules http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/GPO-STYLEM ... 2008-5.htm)






JURISDICTION:

"The omission of the Christian name by either plaintiff or defendant in a legal process prevents the court from acquiring jurisdiction, …"
Bouvier’s Law Dictionary, 8thed., pg. 2287

“Complaint must identify at least one plaintiff by true name; otherwise no action has been commenced.” Roe v New York (1970, SD NY) 49 FRD 279, 14 FR Serv 2d 437, 8 ALR Fed 670.
(The reasoning behind a true name is that neither a State, nor the United States, can pick up a pencil or sneeze, being nothing more than a “piece of paper”. They cannot, therefore, assume the liability of actions nor write a complaint. All activities carried on by governmental agencies are carried out by its agents and actors.)

"Subject matter jurisdiction can never be waived and can be raised at any time, even after trial". Zenith Radio Corp. v. Matsushita Elec. Indus. Co., Ltd., 494 F.Supp. 1161 (D.C. Pa., 1980).

"Judgment of court lacking jurisdiction is void" Burnham v. Superior Court of California, County of Marin, 110 S.Ct. 2105 (1990).

"Jurisdiction, once challenged, cannot be assumed and must be decided." Maine v Thiboutot 100 S. Ct. 250.

"The law requires PROOF OF JURISDICTION to appear on the Record of the administrative agency and all administrative proceedings." Hagans v. Lavine, 415 U.S. 533 (1974)

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q= ... 79nv7_DOoQ



FULL DISCLOSURE AND LEGITIMATE CONTRACTS:

"Disclosure laws and regulations are monitored and enforced by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)." http://definitions.uslegal.com/s/sec-di ... gulations/



US National Commission on Marihuana and Drug Abuse's recommendations:

...its recommendation: Congress should amend federal law to decriminalize the personal use and possession of cannabis and the casual distribution of small amounts for no or insignificant remuneration, and state legislatures should do the same. They also found that marijuana didn't meet the criteria of a Schedule I controlled substance...The commission concluded: "criminal law is too harsh a tool to apply to personal possession even in an effort to discourage use. … The actual and potential harm of use of the drug is not great enough to justify intrusion by the criminal law into private behavior." Since then, some 21.5 million Americans have been arrested and prosecuted for violation of laws against marijuana. More than 80 percent of those arrested were charged only with possession, not sale. The cost of Nixon's "war on drugs," which intensified under Reagan and continues to this day, now exceeds $1 trillion.
The war on drugs has failed. It has had no significant effect on the use and availability of drugs.http://www.blogforarizona.com/blog/law-enforcement/


**********************************************************
My Comments:
It seems like law is all about knowing the laws, (The Constitution is the law of our land, then common, equity, and admiralty law jurisdictions are allowed to the courts also by it)...
and using reason and evidence to determine what is true, and then how to properly apply the law, starting by determining the harm caused (Common Law=Grievances and Redress) by and to every party (groups or individuals as appropriate), and determining what is most equal, fair and just (Thats Equity Law), so the punishments fit any crimes (the harm caused is the crime), and the entire equation is equal and fair to every party.
No force may be exerted upon any life-form except in equal proportion to any force initiated first by that life-form, or when in the course of some mutual agreement with the party to be harmed.
Victimless Crimes are not crimes at all, and are defined as Prostitution, minor drug possession, etc..
Statutes and Codes, Policies and Regulations are not under the jurisdiction of the Court systems, only laws made properly by Congress.
We are free to do anything except cause harm or violate legitimate contracts (Where all terms and conditions are legal and agreed upon by all parties), and no one may search or seize anything from you without reasonable cause to suspect you of causing such harm or violating a legit deal (Which are the only crimes).
Making or enforcing any laws that contradict the constitution, accepting any privilege (Title of Nobility, emolument, etc.) above normal people, are all crimes.
Any person can arrest and prosecute any other person (Even the president if you could), and that is the Supreme law of our land.



2 Peter 2 >>
King James Version
1"But there were false prophets also among the people, even as there shall be false teachers among you, who privily shall bring in damnable heresies, even denying the Lord that bought them, and bring upon themselves swift destruction. 2And many shall follow their pernicious ways; by reason of whom the way of truth shall be evil spoken of. 3And through covetousness shall they with feigned words make merchandise of you: whose judgment now of a long time lingereth not, and their damnation slumbereth not. " (This was nearly 2,000 years ago, about AD 95)

If you are going to argue with these facts, at least post with more than opinions, use some fact that you think supersedes these, or else your post is a waste because it will have already been shown wrong.

Whatever for? Your little fictional courtroom drama above is certainly not a "fact", but a work of imagination. It remains perfectly subject to others' opinions.

harleyborgais wrote:The "United States" is a corporation, and here is why driving and practicing law are rights. . .

Yes it is in fact a, "A group of people elected to govern a city, town, or borough."

Do you really want to play thees word game to quote-mine.

harleyborgais wrote:If you are going to argue with these facts, at least post with more than opinions, use some fact that you think supersedes these, or else your post is a waste because it will have already been shown wrong.

Actually I think any reply to you is a wasted post. That wall-o-text you just posted with so little content doesn't need a reply. Anyone who reads it can see whats going on.

In that long post are the facts that prove the many things I said, but it is obviously too much effort for you.

I have most of that in memory, I have read all of it more than once, and every line seemed important when I copy/pasted it.

Oh, "2And many shall follow their pernicious ways; by reason of whom the way of truth shall be evil spoken of." (Peter, 95 AD).
That sounds like you guys from my perspective, arguing with facts, without even using facts of greater value or authority.

I know,
lets do it one simple thing at a time:

DRIVING IS A RIGHT, NOT A PRIVILEGE, here are many sources of court decisions on this subject...
http://www.policeworld.net/vb/showthrea ... s-licenses
http://www.dismissticket.com/TheLaw.html
http://usa-the-republic.com/mark%20of%2 ... endixJ.htm
http://csa.systekproof.com/?page_id=1502 (Confederate States of America, official website, Nature of Law explained)

"The right of a citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon, by horse-drawn carriage, wagon, or automobile is not a mere privilege which may be permitted or prohibited at will, but a common right which he has under his right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness." Slusher v. Safety Coach Transit Co., 229 Ky 731, 17 SW2d 1012. "

"The use of the highway for the purpose of travel and transportation is not a mere privilege but a common and fundamental right of which the public and individuals cannot rightfully be deprived."
"If a State does erroneously require a License or Fee for exercise of that Right, the Citizen may Ignore the License and or Fee and exercise the Right with Total Impunity". See Schuttlesworth v. Birmingham 373 U.S 262.

"The right of a citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon in the ordinary course of life and business is a common right which he has under his right to enjoy life and liberty, to acquire and posses property, and to pursue happiness and safety." It includes the right in doing so to use the ordinary and usual conveyances of the day; and under the existing modes of travel includes the right to drive a horse-drawn carriage or wagon thereon, or to operate an automobile, thereon, for the usual and ordinary purpose of life and business. It is not a mere privilege..."Thompson v. Smith 154 S.E 579 inparamateria.

"The Motor Vehicle Act is not unconstitutional as making an arbitrary and unwarranted classification, in that it requires professional chauffeurs, or drivers of motor vehicles for hire, to pay an annual license, but exempts all others operators of such vehicles from tax and regulation." [In the Matter of Application of Stork (1914), 167 Cal, 294,295]

"The individual may stand upon his constitutional rights as a [state] Citizen. He is entitled to carry on his private business in his own way. His power to contract is unlimited. He owes no duty to the state or his neighbors to divulge his business, or to open his door to investigation, so far as it my incriminate him. He owes no such duty to the state, since he receives nothing there from, beyond the protection of his life and property. He owes nothing to public so long as he does not trespass on their rights" Hale v. Henkel, 201 U.S 43 (1905) inparamateria.


Those are all saying the same thing, it is against the supreme law here to require any fee, registration, license or any limitation to use the public roadways or other public use areas.

You should really learn your rights. Next up, why they are doing this. I will do these one at a time for your sake.

Now these are quotes from reliable sources, so lets focus of facts here...


“United States” means—
(A) a Federal corporation;
28 USC § 3002 - Definitions
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/28/3002

"There is in our political system [two governments], a government of the Several [50] States, and a government of the United States. Each is distinct from the other and has citizens of its own. A person may be a citizen of the United States and of a State, and as such have different rights." U.S. v. Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542, 23 L.Ed. 588.

Here is the often-expressed understanding from the United States Supreme Court, that "in common usage, the term "person" does not include the Sovereign, statutes employing the word person are ordinarily construed to exclude the Sovereign."

Title 27, 72.11 All Crimes are Commercial---The Federal Tax Lien Act of 1966 also backs this up...... the Entire monetary systems were placed under the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC). The UCC is the code that regulates all negotiable instruments.

Volume 20: Corpus Juris Sec. § 1785: "The United States government is a foreign corporation with respect to a state". NY Re: Merrian, 36 N.E. 505 1441 S.CT. 1973, 41 L.Ed. 287.

"The United States Government as such is fictitious and thus includes the States Government." Blacks Com. 133, Bouvier`s law dictionary, page 1215 (1914).

The Buck Act (4 USC 104 to 113) creates taxable "Federal Areas" within States wherever your federal government sends aid. This includes Social Security. Now read Springfield v. Kenny 104 NE2d 65.

Title 18 USC 9 - Sec. 9. Vessel of the United States defined
The term "vessel of the United States", as used in this title, means a vessel belonging in whole or in part to the United States, or any citizen thereof, or any corporation created by or under the laws of the United States, or of any State, Territory, District, or possession thereof.


From a speech in Congress in The Bankruptcy of The United States United States Congressional Record, March 17, 1993 Vol. 33, page H-1303. Speaker-Rep. James Traficant, Jr. (Ohio) addressing the House:

"Prior to 1913, most Americans owned clear, allodial title to property, free and clear of any liens or mortgages until the Federal Reserve Act (1913) "Hypothecated" all property within the federal United States to the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve - in which the Trustees (stockholders) held legal title. The U.S. citizen (tenant, franchisee) was registered as a "beneficiary" of the trust via his/her birth certificate. In 1933, the federal United States hypothecated all of the present and future properties, assets and labor of their "subjects," the 14th Amendment U.S. citizen, to the Federal Reserve System.

In return, the Federal Reserve System agreed to extend THE FEDERAL United States CORPORATION [emphasis added] all the credit "money substitute" it needed. Like any other debtor, the federal United States government had to assign collateral and security to their creditors as a condition of the loan. Since the federal United States didn't have any assets, they assigned the private property of their "economic slaves", the U.S. citizens as collateral against the unpayable federal debt. They also pledged the unincorporated federal territories, national parks forests, birth certificates, and nonprofit organizations, as collateral against the federal debt. All has already been transferred as payment to the international bankers.

Unwittingly, America has returned to its pre-American Revolution, feudal roots whereby all land is held by a sovereign and the common people had no rights to hold allodial title to property. Once again, We the People are the tenants and sharecroppers renting our own property from a Sovereign in the guise of the Federal Reserve Bank. We the people have exchanged one master for another. ."
http://www.babelmagazine.com/issue66/uscorporation.html

HYPOTHECATION, civil law. This term is used principally in the civil law; it is defined to be a right which a creditor has over a thing belonging to another, and which consists in the power to cause it to be sold, in order to be paid his claim out of the proceeds.

And dont forget that the jurisdiction of the federal, central government is limited to the ten mile square of Washington DC. The way the reached their jurisdiction/hypothetical ownership/sales rights over us is not legal under the supreme law of our land.
You/we can get out of such foreign/unconstitutional rule by knowing the constitution and supreme court definitions of its meanings and applications. Understanding supreme law, sovereignty, and other words is a good thing, I will post those later.


There, that is all the parts for the "United States" is a foreign owned, federal corporation, instead of the Constitutional, Elected Representative Republican Government that so many have fought and died for.
I hope you guys can understand this stuff. It the reason why America is 'Dumbed Down'.

lucek wrote:

harleyborgais wrote:The "United States" is a corporation, and here is why driving and practicing law are rights. . .

Yes it is in fact a, "A group of people elected to govern a city, town, or borough."

Do you really want to play thees word game to quote-mine.

corporation/kɔːpəˈreɪʃn/
▶noun
1 a large company or group of companies authorized to act as a single entity and recognized as such in law.
2 Brit. a group of people elected to govern a city, town, or borough.
3 humorous, dated a paunch.
http://www.wordreference.com/definition/corporation

Your definition is British apparently, and that does not apply here in American law.

Now the actual definition in the legal sense is the one that counts, and it is a bit more involved:

http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictiona ... orporation
"an organization formed with state governmental approval to act as an artificial person to carry on business""a corporation's liability for damages or debts is limited to its assets, so the shareholders and officers are protected from personal claims, unless they commit fraud" "corporations must register with Secretary of States of other states where they do substantial business as a "foreign" corporation." "A de jure corporation is one that is formally operated under the law, while a de facto corporation is one which operates as if it were legal, but without the Articles of Incorporation being valid."

harleyborgais wrote:

lucek wrote:

harleyborgais wrote:The "United States" is a corporation, and here is why driving and practicing law are rights. . .

Yes it is in fact a, "A group of people elected to govern a city, town, or borough."

Do you really want to play thees word game to quote-mine.

corporation/kɔːpəˈreɪʃn/
▶noun
1 a large company or group of companies authorized to act as a single entity and recognized as such in law.
2 Brit. a group of people elected to govern a city, town, or borough.
3 humorous, dated a paunch.
http://www.wordreference.com/definition/corporation

Your definition is British apparently, and that does not apply here in American law.

Now the actual definition in the legal sense is the one that counts, and it is a bit more involved:

http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictiona ... orporation
"an organization formed with state governmental approval to act as an artificial person to carry on business""a corporation's liability for damages or debts is limited to its assets, so the shareholders and officers are protected from personal claims, unless they commit fraud" "corporations must register with Secretary of States of other states where they do substantial business as a "foreign" corporation." "A de jure corporation is one that is formally operated under the law, while a de facto corporation is one which operates as if it were legal, but without the Articles of Incorporation being valid."

Ok going further

cor·po·ra·tion noun \ˌkȯr-pə-ˈrā-shən\

Definition of CORPORATION

1
a : a group of merchants or traders united in a trade guild
b : the municipal authorities of a town or city
2
: a body formed and authorized by law to act as a single person although constituted by one or more persons and legally endowed with various rights and duties including the capacity of succession
3
: an association of employers and employees in a basic industry or of members of a profession organized as an organ of political representation in a corporative state

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/corporation

Thats good, now that we have clearly established what a corporation is, lets look up a republic, or representative form of government, or constitutional government, congress, etc.

Harley Driving isn't a right. Operating a piece of heavy machinery with the risk of harming, maiming, or killing other people or animals can't be a right. Your rights end where the rights of others begin.