by Peter Brown wrote:
And like I said were any of those verses uttered in Medina? You know if they are old Mecca verses they got replaced by the better Medina verses and Medina was the time of Holy war and booty.
You know that you''re cherry-picking just as much those No True Muslims you keep whining about?
Peter Brown wrote:Aside from that, what about the double meaning verses you mentioned, the ones Shiites read one way and Sunni another. Perhaps a few examples of these might break me? They both seem to hate the Jews equally.
Except they don't. Stop making shit up Peter.
I've no interest in presenting additional verses since you've failed to properly adress the initial ones I and others posted.
Peter Brown wrote:I do prefer the Mecca verses, who wouldn't and would most certainly settle to a no vote if all the Medina verses were removed from the Qur’an. It is my hope that one day they will find older Qur'ans and not just day they are incomplete because they lack the Medina verses.
It is possible because as you know, not all academics believe Muhammad was a real person, the whole Qur’an might have been a fabrication to justify the war after Muhammad died? Nobody who wasn’t a Muslim apparently met him did they?
I’d even vote no if dear ol’ Ken’s fable Muhammad’s last sermon was added to the end of the Quran as factual truth, that the Holy war was over and Muslims are no longer allowed to conquer other people like he did.
It's called cherry-picking Peter and you're just as much party to it as those No True Muslims you keep dismissing out of hand.
